Quality assurance and quality control in mammography: a review of available guidance worldwide

Objectives - Review available guidance for quality assurance (QA) in mammography and discuss its contribution to harmonise practices worldwide. Methods - Literature search was performed on different sources to identify guidance documents for QA in mammography available worldwide in international bodies, healthcare providers, professional/scientific associations. The guidance documents identified were reviewed and a selection was compared for type of guidance (clinical/technical), technology and proposed QA methodologies focusing on dose and image quality (IQ) performance assessment. Results - Fourteen protocols (targeted at conventional and digital mammography) were reviewed. All included recommendations for testing acquisition, processing and display systems associated with mammographic equipment. All guidance reviewed highlighted the importance of dose assessment and testing the Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) system. Recommended tests for assessment of IQ showed variations in the proposed methodologies. Recommended testing focused on assessment of low-contrast detection, spatial resolution and noise. QC of image display is recommended following the American Association of Physicists in Medicine guidelines. Conclusions - The existing QA guidance for mammography is derived from key documents (American College of Radiology and European Union guidelines) and proposes similar tests despite the variations in detail and methodologies. Studies reported on QA data should provide detail on experimental technique to allow robust data comparison. Countries aiming to implement a mammography/QA program may select/prioritise the tests depending on available technology and resources.

Statistical analysis of quality control measurements in IMRT for head and neck and prostate cancer

Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) is a technique introduced to shape more precisely the dose distributions to the tumour, providing a higher dose escalation in the volume to irradiate and simultaneously decreasing the dose in the organs at risk which consequently reduces the treatment toxicity. This technique is widely used in prostate and head and neck (H&N) tumours. Given the complexity and the use of high doses in this technique it’s necessary to ensure as a safe and secure administration of the treatment, through the use of quality control programmes for IMRT. The purpose of this study was to evaluate statistically the quality control measurements that are made for the IMRT plans in prostate and H&N patients, before the beginning of the treatment, analysing their variations, the percentage of rejected and repeated measurements, the average, standard deviations and the proportion relations.

Equipment quality control

Mammography equipment must be evaluated to ensure that images will be of acceptable diagnostic quality with lowest radiation dose. Quality Assurance (QA) aims to provide systematic and constant improvement through a feedback mechanism to address the technical, clinical and training aspects. Quality Control (QC), in relation to mammography equipment, comprises a series of tests to determine equipment performance characteristics. The introduction of digital technologies promoted changes in QC tests and protocols and there are some tests that are specific for each manufacturer. Within each country specifi c QC tests should be compliant with regulatory requirements and guidance. Ideally, one mammography practitioner should take overarching responsibility for QC within a service, with all practitioners having responsibility for actual QC testing. All QC results must be documented to facilitate troubleshooting, internal audit and external assessment. Generally speaking, the practitioner’s role includes performing, interpreting and recording the QC tests as well as reporting any out of action limits to their service lead. They must undertake additional continuous professional development to maintain their QC competencies. They are usually supported by technicians and medical physicists; in some countries the latter are mandatory. Technicians and/or medical physicists often perform many of the tests indicated within this chapter. It is important to recognise that this chapter is an attempt to encompass the main tests performed within European countries. Specific tests related to the service that you work within must be familiarised with and adhered too.

Optimising protocol of acquisition and post-processing procedures in the assessment of coronary artery disease by computed tomography

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is currently one of the most prevalent diseases in the world population and calcium deposits in coronary arteries are one direct risk factor. These can be assessed by the calcium score (CS) application, available via a computed tomography (CT) scan, which gives an accurate indication of the development of the disease. However, the ionising radiation applied to patients is high. This study aimed to optimise the protocol acquisition in order to reduce the radiation dose and explain the flow of procedures to quantify CAD. The main differences in the clinical results, when automated or semiautomated post-processing is used, will be shown, and the epidemiology, imaging, risk factors and prognosis of the disease described. The software steps and the values that allow the risk of developingCADto be predicted will be presented. A64-row multidetector CT scan with dual source and two phantoms (pig hearts) were used to demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of the Agatston method. The tube energy was balanced. Two measurements were obtained in each of the three experimental protocols (64, 128, 256 mAs). Considerable changes appeared between the values of CS relating to the protocol variation. The predefined standard protocol provided the lowest dose of radiation (0.43 mGy). This study found that the variation in the radiation dose between protocols, taking into consideration the dose control systems attached to the CT equipment and image quality, was not sufficient to justify changing the default protocol provided by the manufacturer.

Caracterização tecnológica da mamografia digital em Portugal: progresso de um projeto em implementação

Introdução – A mamografia é o principal método de diagnóstico por imagem utilizado no rastreio e diagnóstico do cancro da mama, sendo a modalidade de imagem recomendada em vários países da Europa e Estados Unidos para utilização em programas de rastreio. A implementação da tecnologia digital causou alterações na prática da mamografia, nomeadamente a necessidade de adaptar os programas de controlo de qualidade. Objetivos – Caracterizar a tecnologia instalada para mamografia em Portugal e as práticas adotadas na sua utilização pelos profissionais de saúde envolvidos. Concluir sobre o nível de harmonização das práticas em mamografia em Portugal e a conformidade com as recomendações internacionais. Identificar oportunidades para otimização que permitam assegurar a utilização eficaz e segura da tecnologia. Metodologia – Pesquisa e recolha de dados sobre a tecnologia instalada, fornecidos por fontes governamentais, prestadores de serviços de mamografia e indústria. Construção de três questionários, orientados ao perfil do médico radiologista, técnico de radiologia com atividade em mamografia digital e técnico de radiologia coordenador. Os questionários foram aplicados em 65 prestadores de serviços de mamografia selecionados com base em critérios de localização geográfica, tipo de tecnologia instalada e perfil da instituição. Resultados – Foram identificados 441 sistemas para mamografia em Portugal. A tecnologia mais frequente (62%) e vulgarmente conhecida por radiografia computorizada (computed radiography) é constituída por um detector (image plate) de material fotoestimulável inserido numa cassete de suporte e por um sistema de processamento ótico. A maioria destes sistemas (78%) está instalada em prestadores privados. Aproximadamente 12% dos equipamentos instalados são sistemas para radiografia digital direta (Direct Digital Radiography – DDR). Os critérios para seleção dos parâmetros técnicos de exposição variam, observando-se que em 65% das instituições são adotadas as recomendações dos fabricantes do equipamento. As ferramentas de pós-processamento mais usadas pelos médicos radiologistas são o ajuste do contraste e brilho e magnificação total e/ou localizada da imagem. Quinze instituições (em 19) têm implementado um programa de controlo de qualidade. Conclusões – Portugal apresenta um parque de equipamentos heterogéneo que inclui tecnologia obsoleta e tecnologia “topo de gama”. As recomendações/guidelines (europeias ou americanas) não são adotadas formalmente na maioria das instituições como guia para fundamentação das práticas em mamografia, dominando as recomendações dos fabricantes do equipamento. Foram identificadas, pelos técnicos de radiologia e médicos radiologistas, carências de formação especializada, nomeadamente nas temáticas da intervenção mamária, otimização da dose e controlo da qualidade. A maioria dos inquiridos concorda com a necessidade de certificação da prática da mamografia em Portugal e participaria num programa voluntário. ABSTRACT - Introduction – Mammography is the gold standard for screening and imaging diagnosis of breast disease. It is the imaging modality recommended by screening programs in various countries in Europe and the United States. The implementation of the digital technology promoted changes in mammography practice and triggered the need to adjust quality control programs. Aims –Characterize the technology for mammography installed in Portugal. Assess practice in use in mammography and its harmonization and compliance to international guidelines. Identify optimization needs to promote an effective and efficient use of digital mammography to full potential. Methodology – Literature review was performed. Data was collected from official sources (governmental bodies, mammography healthcare providers and medical imaging industry) regarding the number and specifications of mammography equipment installed in Portugal. Three questionnaires targeted at radiologists, breast radiographers and the chief-radiographer were designed for data collection on the technical and clinical practices in mammography. The questionnaires were delivered in a sample of 65 mammography providers selected according to geographical criteria, type of technology and institution profile. Results – Results revealed 441 mammography systems installed in Portugal. The most frequent (62%) technology type are computerized systems (CR) mostly installed in the private sector (78%). 12% are direct radiography systems (DDR). The criteria for selection of the exposure parameters differ between the institutions with the majority (65%) following the recommendations from the manufacturers. The use of available tools for post-processing is limited being the most frequently reported tools used the contrast/ brightness and Zoom or Pan Magnification tools. Fifteen participant institutions (out of 19) have implemented a quality control programme. Conclusions – The technology for mammography in Portugal is heterogeneous and includes both obsolete and state of the art equipment. International guidelines (European or American) are not formally implemented and the manufacturer recommendations are the most frequently used guidance. Education and training needs were identified amongst the healthcare professionals (radiologists and radiographers) with focus in the areas of mammography intervention, patient dose optimization and quality control. The majority of the participants agree with the certification of mammography in Portugal.