A gestão do risco nas empresas : comparação das práticas de gestão do risco, no setor da construção em Portugal e no Reino Unido

O risco faz parte do dia a dia das organizações e atualmente mais do que nunca deve ser gerido de uma forma consciente. As organizações como forma de transparência na divulgação da informação para os investidores e outras partes interessadas, devem expor as suas políticas de risco e a forma como pretendem alcançar os objetivos que se propõem numa ótica de continuidade e sustentabilidade. Os mercados globais com grande complexidade e forte concorrência levam a que as empresas se afirmem pela sua capacidade de organização. No setor da construção a dispersão geográfica das obras e a correspondente dispersão dos ativos de produção, os concursos públicos e a apresentação de preço assumem especial relevância em termos de análise de risco. Atualmente na matéria da gestão do risco existem várias recomendações ao nível do governo das sociedades e vários modelos que servem de guião para as empresas implementarem na sua gestão do risco. A estrutura conceptual mais atual e considerada o ‘state of the art’ na matéria de gestão do risco é a ISO 31000 Risk management – Principles and Guidelines. Esta norma pretende definir princípios que permitam a cada organização desenvolver um modelo feito à medida, ajustado aos seus processos e alinhado com a sua estratégia.

Identification of resilience factors in rail engineering work

This paper discusses an ongoing project that aims at improving the potential for resilience of a system responsible for the planning of rail engineering work delivery. It focuses on the use of a human factors based approach as a way to achieve this end. In particular, the paper discusses the initial data collected by means of interviews and how this process gave way to a two fold goal: Understanding how the planning process works in reality and identifying any critical aspects of the system from a Resilience Engineering perspective. Given the nature of the process under study, information flows and communication issues have been given particular attention throughout the data collection and analysis stages. Initial data confirms that the planning process is greatly reliant on the capability of people using their knowledge and skills to communicate in a dynamic informational environment. Finally, the added value of the interviews is discussed from a human factors perspective and as a mean towards the aim of better understanding resilience in rail engineering planning.

Resilience in rail engineering work

This paper discusses an ongoing project that aims at improving the potential for resilience of a system responsible for the planning of rail engineering work delivery. This is being addressed by means of a methodology based on the observation and analysis of “real” planning activities, using resilience engineering concepts as a background. Interviews with planners have been carried out to provide an overview of the planning process and steer more in-depth investigation. Analysis of historic information and observation of planners’ main activities is underway. Given the nature of the process under study, information flows and communication issues have been given particular attention throughout the data collection and analysis stages. Initial data confirms that the planning process is greatly reliant on the capability of people using their knowledge and skills to communicate in a dynamic informational environment. Evidence was found of communication breakdowns at the boundaries of different planning levels and teams. The fact that the process is divided amongst several different areas of the organisation, often with different goals and needs, creates potential sources of conflict and tension.