A Concepção Arquitectónica Como Processo: o exemplo de Christopher Alexander

Começam a surgir indícios de que se procura uma substituição da capacidade criativa humana pela programação de processos passíveis de uma automatização informática. Utilizamos o exemplo da obra de Christopher Alexander e advogamos que a concepção arquitectónica proposta por aquele arquitecto é, desde o início, a construção de uma linguagem de estrutura formal funcionalista, por isso programável e algorítmica, cuja discriminação varia da, função focada sobre a concepção do objecto (produção-exigências) para a função focada sobre o sujeito (fruiçãonecessidades). A estrutura de processamento daquele sistema tem origem, no conceito de “resolução de problema” ( problem solving ) e tem como objectivo, a efectiva programação daquilo que hoje é o trabalho criativo humano. Comprova-o o facto de o sistema da “pattern language” ter uma utilização cada vez maior nas investigações informáticas, desde a própria estrutura de programas evolutivos, até aos “object oriented design” ligados à investigação da Inteligência Artificial, passando pelo conceito de “Patterns”, como uma disciplina de engenharia informática para a resolução de problemas 1 . Verificámos na nossa investigação que, paradoxalmente, o mesmo sistema que procura uma libertação democrática da arquitectura – segundo o princípio, “arquitectura de todos para todos” – parece ser, no actual contexto histórico ocidental, um dos sistemas capazes de limitar a Arquitectura, através de um processamento algorítmico de concepção que visa a manipulação de modelos formais preestabelecidos – não obrigatoriamente estáticos – numa “performance” funcional.

Research in Architecture: Looking Backward and Forward: Forty-Year Experience in Architectural Research at the Faculty of Architecture STU

The introduction of my contribution contains a brief information on the Faculty of Architecture of the Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava (FA STU) and the architectural research performed at this institution. Schemes and priorities of our research in architecture have changed several times since the very beginning in early 50’s. The most significant change occurred after “the velvet revolution” in 1989. Since 1990 there have been several sources to support research at universities. The significant part of my contribution is rooted in my own research experience since the time I had joined FA STU in 1975 as a young architect and researcher. The period of the 80’s is characterized by the first unintentional attempts to do “research by design” and my “scientific” achievements as by-products of my design work. Some of them resulted in the following issues: conception of mezzo-space, theory of the complex perception of architectural space and definition of basic principles of ecologically conscious architecture. Nowadays I continue my research by design within the application of so called solar envelope in urban scale with my students.

ARX, model thinking: taxonomy and operativity of an architectural process

The purpose of this work was to establish a taxonomy of hand made model construction as a platform for an approach to project an operative method in architecture. It was therefore studied and catalogued in a systematic approach a broad model production in the work of ARX. A wide range of families and sub-families of models were found, with different purposes according to each phase of development, from searching steps for a new possible configuration to detailed refined decisions. This working method revealed as most relevant characteristics, the grounds for a potential personal reflection and open discussion on project method, its flexibility on space modeling, an accuracy on the representation of real construction situations and its constant and stimulating opening to new suggestions. This research helped on a meta-reflection about this method, having been useful on creating a consciousness of processes that pretend to become an autonomous language, knowledge that might become useful to those who pretend to implement a haptic modus operandi in the work of an architectural project.

Social perception gaze patterns, symptom severity and resting brain function measured using Arterial Spin Labelling

Autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) is characterised by qualitative alterations in reciprocal social interactions. Some recent studies show alterations in gaze patterns during social perception and rest-functional abnormalities in the ‘social brain network’. This study investigated: i) social perception gaze patterns in children with ASD and controls, ii) the relationship between autism clinical severity and social perception gaze patterns, iii) the relationship between resting cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and social perception gaze patterns. Methods: Nine children with ASD and 9 children with typical development were studied. Eye-tracking was used to detect gaze patterns during presentation of stimuli depicting social scenes. Autism clinical severity was established using the Autism Diagnostic Interview Revised (ADI-R). Arterial spin labelling MRI was used to quantify rCBF. Results: The ASD group looked less at social regions and more at non-social regions than controls. No significant correlation was found between ASD clinical severity and social perception gaze patterns. In the ASD group, gaze behaviour was related to rCBF in the temporal lobe regions at trend level. Positive correlations were found between temporal rCBF and gaze to the face region, while negative correlations were found between temporal rCBF and gaze to non-social regions. Conclusions: These preliminary results suggest that social perception gaze patterns are altered in children with ASD, and could be related to temporal rCBF.