"Church in Goa: Servants, slaves and rebels

This article in Goa Herald daily seeks to respond to a round-table conference convoked by Minister Eduardo Faleiro to reflect upon the need of calling the attention of the Goa Church to lack of transparency and accountability in its administration of Church properties.

Indicadores da individualização de cuidados para o curso de licenciatura em enfermagem

RESUMO: A individualização dos cuidados de enfermagem tem sido associada a uma evolução clínica mais favorável, representando um importante parâmetro de avaliação e de desenvolvimento dos serviços de saúde. A tónica atribuída a esta problemática não só é evidenciada por diversos autores, como se enquadra nas metas de modernização do Sistema Nacional de Saúde e é destaque em vários códigos normativos da profissão nacionais e internacionais, como uma obrigação moral e deontológica. Assim, pretende-se mediante os ganhos em saúde sensíveis às intervenções de enfermagem, identificar quais indicadores do cuidado individualizado, para se efectivar a sua incorporação na formação inicial em enfermagem. Para tal efeito, construiu-se uma bateria de indicadores mediante análise de duas revisões sistemáticas da literatura, que teve por base o Modelo da Eficácia do Papel de Enfermagem, desenvolvido por Irvine et al. (1998). Para à adaptação à realidade portuguesa recorreu-se à técnica de Delphi, com duas rondas, que incluiu respectivamente, 12 e 10 peritos de enfermagem. Na análise de dados utilizou-se o nível de concordância superior ou igual a 90%, na última ronda. Na segunda fase do estudo, aplicou-se um inquérito por questionário (α de Cronbach = 0,919) para testar a sua aplicabilidade dos indicadores, a 156 enfermeiros, do mesmo hospital da área da grande Lisboa, no Serviço de Medicina e Cirurgia. Recorreu-se ao SPSS, versão 19 e realizou-se análise univariada e estatística analítica. Na bateria final de indicadores foram incorporados aqueles com ponderação positiva (≥51%). Os dados qualitativos obtidos foram submetidos a análise de conteúdo. Dos 58 indicadores iniciais, consolidaram-se 8 categorias: cuidado à pessoa em fim de vida e família, toque terapêutico, educação para a auto-gestão da saúde, cuidados de proximidade, gestão de casos, empoderamento/ literacia para a saúde, linha telefónica de apoio permanente/ tele-assistência e apoio psico-emocional, com valorização de 28 indicadores. O tempo de experiência profissional, tipo de serviço e tempo de permanência no mesmo serviço influenciou a percepção dos enfermeiros, confirmando os pressupostos de Irvine et al. (1998) e Benner (2001). A correlação total dos indicadores, no questionário, variou entre 0,248 e 0,650, para p<0,01. O facto de todas as correlações serem positivas significa que provavelmente estão associados à problemática da individualização, pelo que se sugere a sua transposição para o ensino de enfermagem. ABSTRACT: The individualization of nursing care has been associated with a more favorable clinical evolution, an important parameter for the evaluation and development of health services. The emphasis given to this problem is not only evidenced by several authors, as fits the goals of modernizing the National Health System and is featured in several normative codes of the profession nationally and internationally, as a moral and ethical obligation. Thus, it is intended by the gains in health sensitive to nursing interventions, identify indicators of individualized care and give effect to its incorporation into the initial training in nursing. For this purpose, we constructed a series of indicators by analyzing two systematic reviews of literature, which was based on the The Nursing Role Effectiveness Model developed by Irvine et al. (1998). For the adaptation to the Portuguese appealed to the Delphi technique with two rounds, which included, respectively, 10 and 12 nursing experts. In data analysis we used the level of agreement greater than or equal to 90% in the last round. In the second phase of the study, we applied a questionnaire (Cronbach's α = 0.919) to test the applicability of the indicators, the 156 nurses in the same hospital in the Greater Lisbon area, the Department of Medicine and Surgery. Done using the SPSS, version 19 and conducted a univariate analysis and analytical statistics. In the final heat of indicators were incorporated into those with positive weight (≥ 51%). Qualitative data were subjected to content analysis. Of the initial 58 indicators, eight were consolidated categories: care to the person and family life, therapeutic touch education for self-management of health care outreach, case management, empowerment / literacy to health, a telephone line permanent support / tele-assistance and psycho-emotional, with an appreciation of 28 indicators. The length of professional experience, type of service and length of stay in the same service influenced the perception of nurses, confirming the assumptions of Irvine et al. (1998) and Benner (2001). The total correlation of the indicators in the questionnaire ranged between 0.248 and 0.650, p <0.01. The fact that all correlations are positive means that are probably associated with the problem of individuation, which is suggested by its implementation in nursing education.

To think museology today

In the present text we intend to analyse 5 basic documents that translate the Museological Thinking in our century and that, chiefly, have led professionals of the area to apply this “science” in a less hermetic way and to understand its practice. The option to study and analyse the documents results from the fact that they influence present day museological practice and thinking. It is impossible to speak of museology nowadays without referring to one of these documents, not to mention a few nations that have even modified and/or created specific laws for the management of their preservationist cultural policy. Anyway, we are aware that this text intends only to carry out a preliminary approach to the documents, in the sense that the wealth of its content would allow us to slowx over an infinity of issues that they raise. I specifically refer to the documents produced at UNESCO Regional Seminar on the Role of Museums in Education, which took place in Rio de Janeiro in 1958; at the Santiago Round Table in 1972, in Chile; at the 1rst New Museology International Workshop, in Quebec, Canada, 1984; at the Oaxtepec Meeting, in Mexico 1984; and at the Caracas Meeting in 1992. These are documents elaborated within the ICOM –International Council of Museums. These documents are the result of a joint reflection by professionals who seek the evolution of ideas within their areas of action, recognising that in order to do so it is necessary to leave the cocoon of the museological institutions and try to discuss their conceptual advances with professionals of related areas. It is important to be capacitated to reuse these advances in their areas of action. This is the recognition of the importance of interdisciplinarity for the museological context.

Museologial process : exclusion criteria

In the last few years, reflections around knowledge building in the museology area have increased considerably, allowing us to cast many gazes over our actions, and, consequently, enabling us to a wider debate around our professional action field, decreasing our exclusion from the academic environment – museologists reproducing the knowledge produced in other areas. In the present work, we shall approach some issues related to the museological process, taking as a reference several studies about the subject, which, due to the time given to us in this round table, could not be re-presented here for discussion. Besides, we have dedicated a chapter to such approach in our publication titled “Museological Process and Education: building a didactic-community museum”. So we have opted instead to carry out a reflection about exclusion, looking into the museum institution and into the application of museological processes; in other words, we shall carry out a self-criticism, in which I include myself, affecting an analysis that will be debated here, considering, additionally, that the museums and museological practices are in relation to the other social global practices, therefore, they are the result of human relations at each historical moment. Finally, based on our lived experience, we shall give continuity to our reflection process, highlighting the importance of knowledge production for the area of museology and the relevance of the theory-practice relation, punctuating some aspects we think that may contribute to the construction of a museological action that may serve as a historical elaboration in securing a space for self- determination.

Who am I? An identity crisis Identity in the new museologies and the role of the museum professional

Whilst the title of this essay suggests more than one “new museology”, it was rather a licence poétique to emphasize the two major theoretical movements that have evolved in the second half of the 20th Century[1]. As a result of the place(s)/contexts where they originated, and for clarity purposes, they have been labelled in this essay as the “Latin new museology” and the “Anglo-Saxon new museology”; however they both identify themselves by just the name of “New Museology”. Even though they both shared similar ideas on participation and inclusion, the language barriers were probably the cause for many ideas not to be fully shared by both groups. The “Latin New museology” was the outcome of a specific context that started in the 1960s (de Varine 1996); being a product of the “Second Museum Revolution”(1970s)[2], it provided new perceptions of heritage, such as “common heritage”. In 1972 ICOM organized the Santiago Round Table, which advocated for museums to engage with the communities they serve, assigning them a role of “problem solvers” within the community (Primo 1999:66). These ideas lead to the concept of the Integral Museum. The Quebec Declaration in 1984 declared that a museum’s aim should be community development and not only “the preservation of past civilisations’ material artefacts”, followed by the Oaxtepec Declaration that claimed for the relationship between territory-heritage-community to be indissoluble (Primo 1999: 69). Finally, in 1992, the Caracas Declaration argued for the museum to “take the responsibility as a social manager reflecting the community’s interests”(Primo 1999: 71). [1] There have been at least three different applications of the term ( Peter van Mensch cited in Mason: 23) [2] According to Santos Primo, this Second Museum Revolution was the result of the Santiago Round Table in Chile, 1972, and furthered by the 1st New Museology International Workshop (Quebec, 1984), Oaxtepec Meeting (Mexico, 1984) and the Caracas Meeting (Venezuela, 1992) (Santos Primo : 63-64)