Find the difference! : eye tracking study on information seeking behavior using an online game

With the advent of digital era web applications have become inevitable part of our lives. We are using the web to manage even the financially or ethically sensitive issues. For this reason exploration of information seeking behavior is an exciting area of research. Current study provides insight on information seeking behavior using a classic ‘Find the Difference’ game. 50 university students between the age of 19 and 26 participated in the study. Eye movement data were recorded with a Tobii T120 device. Participants carried out 4 continuous tasks. Each task included two pictures side by side with 7 hidden differences. After finishing the tasks, participants were asked to repeat the game with the same picture set. This data collection methodology allows the evaluation of learning curves. Additionally, participants were asked about their hand preference. For the purpose of analysis the following metrics were applied: task times (including saccades), fixation count and fixation duration (without saccades). The right- and left-hand side on each picture was selected as AOI (Area of Interest) to detect side preference in connection with hand preference. Results suggest a significant difference between male and female participants regarding aggregated task times (male 58.37s respectively female 68.37s), deviation in the number of fixations and fixation duration (apparently female have less but longer fixations) and also in the distribution of fixations between AOIs. Using eyetracking data current paper highlights the similarities and differences in information acquisition strategies respectively reveals gender and education (Arts vs. Sciences) dependent characteristics of interaction.

''Rainbow Designer'' : for global and multicultural design

What do the designers tend to achieve? To relate themselves to the reality by producing visual registers of emotions and thoughts, or by projecting and producing objects that are functional, adapting technologies to daily needs. That requires that a designer be a keen observer of his physical surroundings and have a fine sensibility to cultures, enabling him to disassemble the latent forms of the reality and cultural symbolisms in order to perceive the order underlying them and the principles of their composition and unity. Only then could he reproduce the nature and respond to cultural callings. In this process of understanding the surrounding reality of nature and cultures, a designer always moves, generally without being aware of it, between two processes: identity search and self-identification.

O designer de produto como elemento de ligação nas equipas multidisciplinares

A possibilidade de manter os mais importantes elementos do design criados pelo designer será possível através de uma mistura de estratégia e conhecimento que o designer deverá ser capaz de gerir da maneira mais proveitosa. O comportamento individual e reservado, geralmente assumido e projetado aos outros intervenientes no processo de desenvolvimento de novos produtos, por parte do designer, já não são suficientes para enfrentar as necessidades cada vez mais competitivas da indústria e do mercado. As ideias e os conceitos que podem ser transmitidas ao designer por um grupo de trabalho permitem a aquisição de múltiplas visões acerca do mesmo objeto em termos de conceito, utilização, produção e mercado, que seriam impossíveis de serem fornecidas por um único indivíduo devido a uma observação subjetiva e à limitação de experiências. A metodologia da investigação multidisciplinar é, sem dúvida, o caminho mais importante a seguir e deverá ser introduzido no ensino de design das escolas desde o princípio e especialmente desde que o Acordo de Bolonha veio reduzir drasticamente as horas de contato entre alunos e docentes.