The future of veterinarians in dairy herd health management

The future of the Veterinary Practice in Dairy Health Management has changed and will change more drastically from our point of view in the next years. The consumer’s pressure and the Media are more and more concerned about animal welfare, traceability of animal products and safety of products of animal origin. On the other hand the Farmers in Europe have to produce under strong rules (competing with other countries outside Europe), which are normally very expensive to put in practice, and the veterinarians should adapt their knowledge to the new challenges, because without their work and cooperation, dairy farming will have no future. In that sense, the old veterinary practice has to go in other ways, otherwise the Veterinarians will loose clients and the animal population in Europe will be reduced. The Dairy farmers will ask for support in other areas besides clinical: efficacy, management, welfare, profitability, nutrition, prophylaxis, economics, reproduction, environmental protection, grassland management, etc. Cattle practitioners should be able to give answers in several subjects and this sets the challenge to our profession - Veterinary preparation has to be very strong in single animal species, particularly in Dairy or beef cows. The cattle practitioner has to look beyond, but he should never forget that “the single animal” has to be looked at as one unit of the herd, which means that without a very good knowledge of the single animal he will be insufficiently prepared to solve herd problems, and the Herd is the sum of several animals. We all know that very often one single animal allows us to implement herd strategies and develop prophylactic programs. We are convinced that the veterinary profession, and in our case the Cattle Medicine should have the ability to evolve, otherwise the Veterinarian as we know him will miss the train in the next years.

Maternal Recognition of Pregnancy in the Mare : a mini review

Nos equinos, um grande número de eventos das fases iniciais do desenvolvimento embrionário são únicos e distintos daqueles que se verificam em outras espécies, incluindo os críticos mas pouco esclarecidos mecanismos de reconhecimento materno da gestação. Este processo fisiológico, através do qual o concepto sinaliza a sua presença ao organismo materno assegurando a manutenção do corpo lúteo (CL) primário e, consequentemente, dos níveis de progesterona necessários à sobrevivência e desenvolvimento do embrião, está pouco esclarecido. De facto, ainda não é claro qual o sinal embrionário primário que assegura a manutenção do CL nos equinos e, apesar do número de potenciais factores que contribuem para o reconhecimento e manutenção da gestação não parar de crescer, nenhum é capaz por si só de satisfazer todos os critérios que caracterizam um factor anti-luteolítico ou luteostático. Por outro lado, é geralmente aceite o conceito de que o reconhecimento materno da gestação é um fenómeno fisiológico de extrema importância e que qualquer falha, quer no envio quer na recepção do sinal apropriado, pode levar a morte embrionária. De facto, a perda de gestações durante ou à volta do espaço de tempo em que ocorre o reconhecimento materno da gestação (i.e dias 10-16 após a ovulação) é comum mas imprevisível (e, portanto, difícil de controlar e prevenir) na prática clínica, sendo uma causa de grandes perdas económicas.

Analysis of mediation and reciprocal effects of changes in weight, self-esteem, and exercise in a behavioral weight loss treatment

Improving the treatment of obesity remains a critical challenge. Several health behaviour change models, often based on a social-cognitive framework, have been used to design weight management interventions (Baranowski et al., 2003). However, most interventions have only produced modest weight reductions (Wadden et al., 2002) and socialcognitive variables have shown limited power to predict weight outcomes (Palmeira et al., 2007). Other predictors, and possibl alte nati e e planatory models, are needed to better understand the mechanisms by which weight loss and other obesity treatment-outcomes are brought about (Baranowski, 2006). Self-esteem is one of these possible mechanisms, because is commonly reported to change during the treatment, although these changes are not necessarily associated with weight loss (Blaine et al., 2007; Maciejewski et al., 2005). This possibility should be more evident if the program integrates regular exercise, as it promotes improvements in subjective well-being (Biddle & Mutrie, 2001), with possible influences on long-term behavioral adherence (e.g. diet, exercise). Following the reciprocal effects model tenets (Marsh & Craven, 2006), we expect that the influences between changes in weight, selfesteem and exercise to be reciprocal and might present one of the mechanisms by which obesity treatments can be improved.