Memory and power : two movements

The institutions that work with the preservation and diffusion of cultural heritage - be them archive, libraries, museums, art galleries or cultural centres - present a certain discourse about reality. To understand this discourse, composed by sound and silence, by fullness and emptiness, by presence and absence, by remembrance and forgetting, an operation is implied, not only with the enunciation of speech and its gaps, but also the comprehension of that which causes to speak, of who is speaking and of the point whence one speaks. Preservation and destruction, or, in another way, conservation and loss, walk hand in hand in the arteries of life. As suggested by Nietzsche (1999, p.273), it is impossible to live without loss, it is entirely impossible to live avoiding destruction to play its game and drive the dynamics of life on. However, by means of a kind of tautological argument, one often justifies preservation by the imminence of loss and memory by the threat of forgetting. Thus, one ceases to consider that the game and the rules of the game between forgetting and memory are not fed by themselves and that preservation and destruction are not opposed in a deadly duel, but instead they complement one another and are always at the service of subjects that build themselves and are built through social practices. To indicate that memories and forgettings can be sown and cultivated corroborates the importance of working towards the denaturalisation of these concepts and towards the understanding that they result from a construction process also involving other forces, such as: power. Power is a sower, a promoter of memories and forgettings.

Sistemas digitais directos vs indirectos : níveis de referência de diagnóstico locais na radiografia de tórax em projeção postero-anterior em dois hospitais portugueses

Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar e comparar as doses de radiação recolhidas numa amostra de 69 pacientes, em dois hospitais, com diferentes métodos de aquisição de imagem digital, direta e indireta, que realizaram radiografia de tórax, em projeção postero-anterior (PA). Para os dois hospitais, a dose à entrada da pele (DEP) e efectiva (E), foram medidas usando o software PCXMC para comparação entre si e com referências internacionais. No Hospital A, com aquisição digital direta, a média de DEP foi de 0,089 mGy e a média de E foi 0,013 mSv. No Hospital B, com aquisição digital de indireta, a média de DEP foi de 0.151 mGy e a média de E foi 0.030mSv. Em ambos os hospitais, as doses médias não ultrapassaram os limites recomendados por lei (0,3 mGy). Para a radiografia de tórax PA, o nível de referência diagnostico (NRD) local calculado foi 0.107 mGy, para o Hospital A e 0.164 mGy, para o Hospital B. Na radiografia de tórax PA, a utilização de um sistema de aquisição direta implicou uma redução de dose de 41 %, concordante com as referências disponíveis que apontam para a redução da dose de cerca de 50 % entre os dois sistemas.