Teaching drawing: an interdisciplinary pedagogical experience in a graphic design course

Various authors have written about the importance of drawing in design methodology. Their general conclusion points drawing as an essential tool for design research, as it allows investigation of several alternative solutions in design process (Cross, 2007). The recent profound changes in design nature (Norman, 2011), justify a discussion on the purpose of drawing in design courses. As a consequence of this new reality, the educational institutions face the challenge of the definition of their curricular structures and teaching methodologies. Among others, concepts such as collaboration and multidisciplinary design approaches have been discussed as strategies for design education (Heller and Talarico, 2011, pp. 82-85). In this context, and using our teaching activity experience in Drawing and Design areas, the authors discuss:  how can drawing methods be included in the current design teaching?  can drawing be considered as an interdisciplinary approach?  what contributions can these methodologies provide to the educational/learning process? Based on these concerns, we developed an interdisciplinary project in the Graphic Design Course with two curricular units: Drawing 1 and Aesthetic and Design Theory 1. In this article the authors present the aims and process developed, and discuss the outcomes of this pedagogical experience.

Contribution towards a reflection about methodological strategies in design education and the function of drawing in design

This work presents a reflection on Design education and specifically on the role of Drawing in this area. As a subject, Design has expanded its field of action expanding into new areas such as Experience Design or Service Design. It became necessary for the designer to have more than an education based on technological knowledge or know-how. Many authors like Meredith Davis, Don Norman or Jamie Hobson point out the urgency to review the curricula of Design courses because nowadays “… design is more than appearance, design is about interaction, about strategy and about services. Designers change social behavior” (Norman 2011). When shifting from a product-centered design to a person-centered design (in a structure, a service or in a relationship) what should the function of drawing in a design course be? What should its curriculum be? Our work methodology will be to confront today’s perspectives on design theory and practice in an attempt to add to the discussion on the methodological strategies in design teaching in the contemporary context.

Contributo para uma reflexão sobre estratégias metodológicas no ensino do Design e a função do Desenho em Design

Neste trabalho apresentaremos uma reflexão sobre o ensino do Design e, especificamente, sobre a função do Desenho nessa área disciplinar. O Design, enquanto disciplina, alargou a sua área de actuação diversificando-se em novos campos como o Design de Experiência ou o Design de Serviço, não bastando ao designer uma formação ligada ao conhecimento tecnológico, ou ao “saber-fazer”. Diversos autores, como Meredith Davis, Don Norman ou Jamie Hobson, alertam para a urgência de uma reflexão aprofundada sobre as estruturas curriculares dos cursos de Design, já que na actualidade “(…) design is more than appearance, design is about interaction, about strategy and about services. Designers change social behavior” (Norman, 2011). Na passagem de um design centrado na forma, para um design centrado na pessoa (numa estrutura, num serviço, ou numa relação) qual deverá ser a função do desenho num curso de design? Qual deverá ser a sua estrutura programática? Como metodologia de trabalho iremos confrontar perspectivas actuais da teoria e da prática do design que equacionam esta problemática procurando, deste modo, contribuir para a reflexão de estratégias metodológicas no ensino do design no contexto contemporâneo.

Contribution towards a reflection about methodological strategies in Design Education and the function of Drawing in Design

This work presents a reflection on Design education and specifically on the role of Drawing in this area. As a subject, Design has expanded its field of action expanding into new areas such as Experience Design or Service Design. It became necessary for the designer to have more than an education based on technological knowledge or know-how. Many authors like Meredith Davis, Don Norman or Jamie Hobson point out the urgency to review the curricula of Design courses because nowadays “ … design is more than appearance, design is about interaction, about strategy and about services. Designers change social behavior” (Norman, 2011) When shifting from a product-centered design to a person-centered design (in a structure, a service or in a relationship) what should the function of drawing in a design course be? What should its curriculum be? Our work methodology will be to confront today’s perspectives on design theory and practice in an attempt to add to the discussion on the methodological strategies in design teaching in the contemporary context.

Reflexão sobre estratégias metodológicas no ensino do design e a função do desenho em design

Neste trabalho apresentaremos uma reflexão sobre o ensino do Design e, especificamente, sobre a função do Desenho nessa área disciplinar. O Design, enquanto disciplina, alargou a sua área de actuação diversificando-se em novos campos como o Design de Experiência ou o Design de Serviço, não bastando ao designer uma formação ligada ao conhecimento tecnológico, ou ao “saber-fazer”. Diversos autores, como Meredith Davis, Don Norman ou Jamie Hobson, alertam para a urgência de uma reflexão aprofundada sobre as estruturas curriculares dos cursos de Design, já que na actualidade “(…) design is more than appearance, design is about interaction, about strategy and about services. Designers change social behavior” (Norman, 2011). Na passagem de um design centrado na forma, para um design centrado na pessoa (numa estrutura, num serviço, ou numa relação) qual deverá ser a função do desenho num curso de design? Qual deverá ser a sua estrutura programática? Como metodologia de trabalho iremos confrontar perspectivas actuais da teoria e da prática do design que equacionam esta problemática procurando, deste modo, contribuir para a reflexão de estratégias metodológicas no ensino do design no contexto contemporâneo.

Reflexão sobre Estratégias Metodológicas no Ensino do Design e a Função do Desenho em Design

Somos habitantes de um mundo que sofre constantes transformações estruturais em qualquer área. As tecnologias, a globalização e a política dos mercados, deslocam tudo e todos da sua zona de conforto, exigindo constantes adaptações a novos vocabulários e hábitos para os quais não temos antecedentes. Novas competências devem ser adquiridas face às novas exigências, e no ensino, base de uma preparação (pessoal e profissional), impõe-se uma constante revisão de estratégias metodológicas de aquisição e partilha de conhecimento. Neste trabalho apresentaremos uma reflexão sobre o ensino do Design e, especificamente, sobre a função do Desenho nessa área disciplinar. O Design, enquanto disciplina, alargou a sua área de actuação diversificando-se em novos campos como o Design de Experiência ou o Design de Serviço, não bastando ao designer uma formação ligada ao conhecimento tecnológico, ou ao “saber-fazer”. Diversos autores, como Meredith Davis, Don Norman ou Jamie Hobson, alertam para a urgência de uma reflexão aprofundada sobre as estruturas curriculares dos cursos de Design, já que na actualidade “(…) design is more than appearance, design is about interaction, about strategy and about services. Designers change social behavior.” Na passagem de um design centrado na forma, para um design centrado na pessoa (numa estrutura, num serviço, ou numa relação) qual deverá ser a função do desenho num curso de design? Qual deverá ser a sua estrutura programática? Como metodologia de trabalho iremos confrontar perspectivas actuais da teoria e da prática do design que equacionam esta problemática procurando, deste modo, contribuir para a reflexão de estratégias metodológicas no ensino do design no contexto contemporâneo.

GUI Inspection from Source Code Analysis

Graphical user interfaces (GUIs) are critical components of todays software. Given their increased relevance, correctness and usability of GUIs are becoming essential. This paper describes the latest results in the development of our tool to reverse engineer the GUI layer of interactive computing systems. We use static analysis techniques to generate models of the user interface behaviour from source code. Models help in graphical user interface inspection by allowing designers to concentrate on its more important aspects. One particularly type of model that the tool is able to generate is state machines. The paper shows how graph theory can be useful when applied to these models. A number of metrics and algorithms are used in the analysis of aspects of the user interface's quality. The ultimate goal of the tool is to enable analysis of interactive system through GUIs source code inspection.

A Generic Library for GUI Reasoning and Testing

Graphical user interfaces (GUIs) make software easy to use by providing the user with visual controls. Therefore, correctness of GUI's code is essential to the correct execution of the overall software. Models can help in the evaluation of interactive applications by allowing designers to concentrate on its more important aspects. This paper presents a generic model for language-independent reverse engineering of graphical user interface based applications, and we explore the integration of model-based testing techniques in our approach, thus allowing us to perform fault detection. A prototype tool has been constructed, which is already capable of deriving and testing a user interface behavioral model of applications written in Java/Swing.

Combining Formal Methods and Functional Strategies Regarding the Reverse Engineering of Interactive Applications

Abstract. Graphical user interfaces (GUIs) make software easy to use by providing the user with visual controls. Therefore, correctness of GUI’s code is essential to the correct execution of the overall software. Models can help in the evaluation of interactive applications by allowing designers to concentrate on its more important aspects. This paper describes our approach to reverse engineer an abstract model of a user interface directly from the GUI’s legacy code. We also present results from a case study. These results are encouraging and give evidence that the goal of reverse engineering user interfaces can be met with more work on this technique.

Models for the Reverse Engineering of Java/Swing Applications

Abstract. Interest in design and development of graphical user interface (GUIs) is growing in the last few years. However, correctness of GUI's code is essential to the correct execution of the overall software. Models can help in the evaluation of interactive applications by allowing designers to concentrate on its more important aspects. This paper describes our approach to reverse engineering abstract GUI models directly from the Java/Swing code.

COORDINSPECTOR: a tool for extracting coordination data from legacy code

More and more current software systems rely on non trivial coordination logic for combining autonomous services typically running on different platforms and often owned by different organizations. Often, however, coordination data is deeply entangled in the code and, therefore, difficult to isolate and analyse separately. COORDINSPECTOR is a software tool which combines slicing and program analysis techniques to isolate all coordination elements from the source code of an existing application. Such a reverse engineering process provides a clear view of the actually invoked services as well as of the orchestration patterns which bind them together. The tool analyses Common Intermediate Language (CIL) code, the native language of Microsoft .Net Framework. Therefore, the scope of application of COORDINSPECTOR is quite large: potentially any piece of code developed in any of the programming languages which compiles to the .Net Framework. The tool generates graphical representations of the coordination layer together and identifies the underlying business process orchestrations, rendering them as Orc specifications

El campo ampliado de la ilustración en contemporaneidad. Breves consideraciones a partir de la experiência en la enseñanza superior

In this paper, we return once again to the definition of illustration, combining the contributions of visual arts and graphic design. Contributing to the discussion in an open and speculative. We analyze the subject based on the theory, but also on the observed practice in contemporary times. We cross references with the higher education lecturing in the master in Illustration and Animation at Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e Ave, while giving a broad picture of illustration practice in Portugal.

Analysis of computing open source systems

Graphical user interfaces (GUIs) are critical components of today's open source software. Given their increased relevance, the correctness and usability of GUIs are becoming essential. This paper describes the latest results in the development of our tool to reverse engineer the GUI layer of interactive computing open source systems. We use static analysis techniques to generate models of the user interface behavior from source code. Models help in graphical user interface inspection by allowing designers to concentrate on its more important aspects. One particular type of model that the tool is able to generate is state machines. The paper shows how graph theory can be useful when applied to these models. A number of metrics and algorithms are used in the analysis of aspects of the user interface's quality. The ultimate goal of the tool is to enable analysis of interactive system through GUIs source code inspection.

Automation & control remote laboratory: evaluating a cooperative methodology

This paper presents a study carried out in order to evaluate the students' perception in the development and use of remote Control and Automation education kits developed by two Universities. Three projects, based on real world environments, were implemented, being local and remotely operated. Students implemented the kits using the theoretical and practical knowledge, being the teachers a catalyst in the learning process. When kits were operational, end-user students got acquainted to the kits in the course curricula units. It is the author's believe that successful results were achieved not only in the learning progress on the Automation and Control fields (hard skills) but also on the development of the students soft skills, leading to encouraging and rewarding goals, motivating their future decisions and promoting synergies in their work. The design of learning experimental kits by students, under teacher supervision, for future use in course curricula by enduser students is an advantageous and rewarding experience.

Exploring the interdisciplinary process in design education

The work presented herein follows an ongoing research that aims to analyze methodological practices to be applied in Design Education. A reflection about methodological strategies in Design Education and the function of drawing in Design represents the beginning of this study. Then, we developed an interdisciplinary pedagogical experience with the Graphic Design 1st grade students from our institution (IPCA). In the current academic year, 2013/2014, we continue to evolve this project, introducing changes in the initial proposal. Major alterations focused on the aspects that could be strengthened in terms of interdisciplinarity. In this article, the authors describe those changes and discuss the outcomes of the novel proposal. As we have already reported, this investigation follows a reflection about working methods to be adopted in Design Education. This is in accordance with other previously published works that purpose the enlargement of Design into new knowledge fields such as Experience or Service Design, changing not only the role of the graphic designer, but also the skills required to be a professional designer (Alain Findelli, 2001), (Brian Lawson, 2006), (Ciampa-Brewer, 2010). Furthermore, concepts such as cooperation or multidisciplinary design, amongst others, have been frequently debated as design teaching strategies (Heller and Talarico, 2011, pp. 82-85). These educational approaches also have an impact on our research. The analysis of all these authors’ contributions together with a reflection on our teaching practice allowed us to propose an improved interdisciplinary intervention.