Lições de Direito Económico e Financeiro, 1º Ano

I – O “DIREITO ECONÓMICO”: O ESTADO COMO PRODUTOR DE BENS E SERVIÇOS E O ESTADO COMO REGULADOR DA ECONOMIA: O PLANEAMENTO E AS MEDIDAS DE ESTÍMULO OU FOMENTO; O ACESSO À ACTIVIDADE ECONÓMICA; II – CONCEITO E TIPOLOGIA DAS EMPRESAS; III – ALGUMAS EMPRESAS EM ESPECIAL; IV – DIREITO PENAL ECONÓMICO E DE EMPRESA; V – “CONTENCIOSO DAS EMPRESAS”; VI – DIREITO DO CONSUMO, DIREITO DAS EMPRESAS E DIREITO PENAL ECONÓMICO; VII – DIREITO DA CONCORRÊNCIA E DOS PREÇOS; VIII – DIREITO MONETÁRIO, FINANCEIRO E DOS MERCADOS DE VALORES MOBILIÁRIOS: INSTRUMENTOS E MERCADOS FINANCEIROS; IX - REGULAÇÃO DO AMBIENTE E DA ACTIVIDADE ECONÓMICA; X - REGULAÇÃO DA QUALIDADE; XI – DIREITO FINANCEIRO PÚBLICO. §I - "ECONOMIC LAW": THE STATE AS PRODUCER OF GOODS AND SERVICES AND THE STATE AS A ECONOMY REGULATOR: PLANNING AND MEASURES OF STIMULUS OR PROMOTION; ACCESS TO ECONOMIC ACTIVITY II - CONCEPT AND TYPE OF COMPANIES III - SOME SPECIAL COMPANIES IV - ECONOMIC AND CRIMINAL LAW COMPANY, V – “LITIGATION IN COMPANIES”; VI - LAW CONSUMER, LAW OF COMPANIES AND ECONOMIC CRIMINAL LAW; VII - COMPETITION LAW AND PRICES; VIII - MONETARY LAW, FINANCIAL AND SECURITIES MARKETS: FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND MARKETS; X - REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT AND ECONOMIC ACTIVITY: X - ADJUSTMENT OF QUALITY; XI - PUBLIC FINANCIAL LAW.

A generic model for integration of Quality, Environment and Safety Management Systems

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to propose a generic model of Integrated Management System of Quality, Environment and Safety (IMS-QES) that can be adapted and progressively to assimilate various Management Systems, of which highlights: ISO 9001 for Quality; ISO 14001 for Environment; OHSAS 18001 for Occupational Health and Safety. Design/methodology/approach – The model was designed in the real environment of a Portuguese Organization and 160 employees were surveyed. The rate response was equal to 86 percent. The conceived model was implemented in a first phase for the integration of Quality, Environment and Safety Management Systems. Findings – Among the main findings of the survey the paper highlights: the elimination of conflicts between individual systems with resources optimization; creation of added value to the business by eliminating several types of wastes; the integrated management of sustainability components in a global market; the improvement of partnerships with suppliers of goods and services; reducing the number of internal and external audits. Originality/value – This case study is one of the first Portuguese empirical researches about IMS-QES and the paper believes that it can be useful in the creation of a Portuguese guideline for integration, namely the Quality Management Systems; Environmental Management Systems and Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems among others.

Anotação, numa perspectiva de Direito Penal Constitucional, de Criminologia e de Política Criminal, de alguns dos aspectos do Acórdão do Tribunal Constitucional (português) n.º 353/2012, de 5 de Julho de 2012 - o problema da legítima defesa de bens jurídicos individuais e bens jurídicos colectivos, bens jurídicos supra-individuais e/ou bens jurídicos comunitários no meio do Estado de Direito e do Estado Social

o Acórdão do Tribunal Constitucional português n.º 353/2012, de 5 de Julho de 2012, ao declarar a respectiva inconstitucionalidade com força obrigatória geral, colocou em evidência a existência de bens jurídicos individuais e bens jurídicos colectivos, bens jurídicos supra-individuais, bens jurídicos comunitários. Bens jurídicos estes que devem e têm que ser tutelados e protegidos. A legítima defesa pode existir quer em relação à agressão actual e ilícita de bens jurídicos individuais, quer em relação à agressão actual e ilícita de bens jurídicos colectivos, bens jurídicos supra-individuais e/ou bens jurídicos comunitários? Parte muito substancial e importante da Doutrina indica que sim. Mas, então, como reagir, no contexto da hipotética legítima defesa, face à eventual agressão actual e ilícita dos bens jurídicos tutelados, agora com valor reforçado, pelo próprio Tribunal Constitucional? E qual o papel do direito constitucional de resistência? Este artigo pretende fornecer um muito breve contributo para a solução das correspondentes questões. A questão dos Direitos Fundamentais, o Desenvolvimento e a modernidade. § the Sentence of the (Portuguese) Constitutional Court n. 353/2012 of July 5, 2012, declaring its generally binding unconstitutionality, has highlighted the existence of individual legal goods and collective legal goods, supra-individual legal goods, community legal goods. These legal goods, that should and must be defended and protected. Legitimate defense can be either relative to the current and illicit aggression to individual legal goods, whether in relation to the current and illicit aggression to collective legal goods, supra-individual legal goods or community legal goods? Very substantial and important part of the Doctrine would appear so. But then how to respond, in the context of hypothetical self-defense, in the face of possible current and illicit aggression of the protected legal goods, now with enhanced value, by the Constitutional Court? And what is the role of the constitutional right of resistance? This article is intended to provide a very brief contribution to the solution of the corresponding questions. The question of Fundamental Rights, Development and modernity.