An ecosystem of products and systems for ambient intelligence – the AAL4ALL users perspective

Developed societies are currently facing severe demographic changes: the world is getting older at an unprecedented rate. In 2000, about 420 million people, or approximately 7 percent of the world population, were aged 65 or older. By 2050, that number will be nearly 1.5 billion people, about 16 percent of the world population. This demographic trend will be also followed by an increase of people with physical limitations. New challenges will be raised to the traditional health care systems, not only in Portugal, but also in all other European states. There is an urgent need to find solutions that allow extending the time people can live in their preferred environment by increasing their autonomy, self-confidence and mobility. AAL4ALL presents an idea for an answer through the development of an ecosystem of products and services for Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) associated to a business model and validated through large scale trial. This paper presents the results of the first survey developed within the AAL4ALL project: the users’ survey targeted at the Portuguese seniors and pre-seniors. This paper is, thus, about the lives of the Portuguese population aged 50 and over.

Mediação: Confiança versus Responsabilidade

A mediação aparece inserida num movimento de reformas do sistema judiciário europeu como forma de responder imediatamente á descrença dos cidadãos nas estruturas do poder judicial e na eficiência da justiça. A mediação, per si, coloca a questão do elenco da confiança e da responsabilidade entre duas pessoas, como conceito define-se justamente na relação dialógica confiança/responsabilidade que produz efeitos na esfera jurídica dos interessados, as partes que decidem resolver o litígio recorrendo á intervenção de um terceiro, o mediador. É um meio extrajudicial de resolução de litígios, com carácter privado, informal, confidencial, voluntário e de natureza não conscienciosa, na qual as partes com a sua participação activa e directa, são auxiliadas por um mediador a encontrar por si próprias, uma solução negociada e amigável para o conflito. A sua natureza não conscienciosa impõe o respeito pelos princípios da cooperação e da boa fé, com vista a alcançar, de forma concertada, resultado consensual, que satisfaça ambas as partes. Neste âmbito a confiança e a responsabilidade são os dois pólos de um meridiano denominado de mediação: por meio de- através de-chegar a um acordo. Se por um lado a confiança é um elemento constitutivo da relação fática e simples de consenso porque não se trata nenhum negocio jurídico, contrato em especial, nem mero ato jurídico- por outro lado, o mediador pode ser responsável pela falta de acordo. Mas o apuramento desta responsabilidade pode não ser visível através dos óculos de culpa grosseira vertida no artigo 16º da Portaria 1112/2005 de 28 de Outubro. Efectivamente, as partes que recorrem a este meio alternativo de resolução de litígios têm direito a esperar que o mediador cumpra a lei, mas tal pode não acontecer. Assim, o exercício da mediação é ou pode ser uma fonte de responsabilidade quando o mediador viola os seus deveres, ainda que não de forma dolorosa, intencional. Ora se o Estado quer que os cidadãos acreditem nos meios extra judiciais, confiem na mediação dos Julgados de Paz, então deve promover no sentido de dizer claramente que esta atento ao desempenho do mediador, e que se advier um dano para o cidadão, o Estado deverá assumir a responsabilidade.

Loneliness in Middle and Old Age

Purpose of the research: (a) To identify the degree of much loneliness reported in the Portuguese population over 50 years of age and (b) test whether loneliness can be predicted by socio-demographic, health related or social characteristic of the sample other than age. Materials and methods: 1174 late middle age and older adults were interviewed face to face by different interviewers across the country; after the informed consent was signed, we asked the participants several socio-demographic and health-related questions; finally we asked ‘‘How often do you feel lonely?’’ and participants responded according to a five point Likert scale. Principal results: The results showed that 12% of participants reporting feeling lonely often or always, whereas 40% reporting never feeling lonely. The remaining 48% self-reported they felt lonely seldom or sometimes. Additionally, results show that, when taken together, variables such as marital status, type of housing, residence settings, health conditions, social satisfaction, social isolation, lack of interest, transportation, and age were predictors of loneliness. Major conclusions: (1) The association of loneliness with advanced age has been greatly exaggerated by mass media and common sense; (2) But although our findings did not confirm the most alarmist views, the 12% of older adults reporting that they are feeling lonely always or often should be cause for attention and concern. It is necessary to understand the meaning, reasons and level of suffering implied on those feelings of loneliness. (3) Our findings suggest that it makes no sense to construe age as a singular feature or cause for feelings of loneliness. Instead, age and also a number of other features combine to predict feelings of loneliness. But even with our predictor variables there was a substantial of variance left unexplained. Therefore it is necessary to continue exploring how feelings of loneliness arise from the experience of living and how they can be changed.