O olhar da população vimaranense através da imprensa local da Capital Europeia da Cultura

A nomeação de Guimarães como Capital Europeia da Cultura (CEC) em 2012, para além de suscitar o natural orgulho e reforçar a auto-estima dos residentes, veio colocar na ordem do dia a necessidade de medir os efeitos que a concretização deste mega-evento pode provocar na cidade e no resto do município. A discussão dos benefícios e dos custos e um alargado envolvimento da comunidade tende a permitir encontrar formas de reduzir os impactos negativos e aumentar os impactos positivos. Para isto, importa realizar debates e promover a participação e envolvimento da comunidade. Esta comunicação analisa o envolvimento da população e das associações locais na Capital Europeia da Cultura 2012 através da cobertura feita pela imprensa local à preparação do evento. A análise de conteúdo às notícias publicadas abrangeu o período que medeia entre Janeiro e Agosto de 2011 e respeitou a dois semanários locais. Com base na análise efectuada, pode concluir-se que tem existido uma forte reacção negativa por parte da população e das associações locais à entidade organizadora da CEC 2012, que colocam em questão o envolvimento e participação prevista dos vimaranenses no evento. Resta saber se a nova gestão, nomeada em Agosto de 2011, será capaz de recuperar o entusiasmo e apoio da população vimaranense ao projecto a tempo de se constituir como um factor de sucesso deste mega-evento.

Loneliness in Middle and Old Age

Purpose of the research: (a) To identify the degree of much loneliness reported in the Portuguese population over 50 years of age and (b) test whether loneliness can be predicted by socio-demographic, health related or social characteristic of the sample other than age. Materials and methods: 1174 late middle age and older adults were interviewed face to face by different interviewers across the country; after the informed consent was signed, we asked the participants several socio-demographic and health-related questions; finally we asked ‘‘How often do you feel lonely?’’ and participants responded according to a five point Likert scale. Principal results: The results showed that 12% of participants reporting feeling lonely often or always, whereas 40% reporting never feeling lonely. The remaining 48% self-reported they felt lonely seldom or sometimes. Additionally, results show that, when taken together, variables such as marital status, type of housing, residence settings, health conditions, social satisfaction, social isolation, lack of interest, transportation, and age were predictors of loneliness. Major conclusions: (1) The association of loneliness with advanced age has been greatly exaggerated by mass media and common sense; (2) But although our findings did not confirm the most alarmist views, the 12% of older adults reporting that they are feeling lonely always or often should be cause for attention and concern. It is necessary to understand the meaning, reasons and level of suffering implied on those feelings of loneliness. (3) Our findings suggest that it makes no sense to construe age as a singular feature or cause for feelings of loneliness. Instead, age and also a number of other features combine to predict feelings of loneliness. But even with our predictor variables there was a substantial of variance left unexplained. Therefore it is necessary to continue exploring how feelings of loneliness arise from the experience of living and how they can be changed.

Direct communication versus virtual communication in virtual teams

Several studies suggest that computer-mediated communication can lead to decreases in group effectiveness and reduce satisfaction levels in terms of trust and comfort of its users. Supported by an experiment, where the emotional or affective aspects of communication were tested with the experimentation of two architectures, Direct Communication Architecture (DCA) and the Virtual Communication Architecture (VCA) this paper validates the thesis that, from the users’ perspective, there is no opposition to the acceptance of virtual environments and interfaces for communication, and that these environments are able to cope with the reconfiguration dynamics requirements of virtual teams or client-server relations in a virtual enterprise operation.