6 resultados para Marriage contract
em CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal
Resumo:
Resumo: 1 – Sumário do Acórdão do Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, de 25 de Janeiro de 2011; 2 – Texto completo do Acórdão do Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, de 25 de Janeiro de 2011, Juiz Conselheiro Garcia CALEJO (Relator), Juiz Conselheiro Hélder ROQUE e Juiz Conselheiro Sebastião PÓVOAS: cfr. http://www.dgsi.pt , 21 de Abril de 2011; 3 – Anotação; 3.1 – Introdução à anotação; 3.2 – A questão da resolução em termos gerais; 3.3 – A questão da resolução no «contrato atípico de franquia»; 4 – Conclusões; § Abstract: 1 - Summary of the Sentence of the Supreme Court of Justice, 25 of January of 2011; 2 - Complete text of the Sentence of the Supreme Court of Justice, 25 of January of 2011, Advising Judge Garcia CALEJO (Reporter), Advising Judge Hélder ROQUE and Advising Juiz Sebastião PÓVOAS: cfr. http://www.dgsi.pt , 21 of April of 2011; 3 - Notation; 3.1 - Introduction to the notation; 3.2 - The question of the resolution in general terms; 3.3 - The question of the resolution in the «atypical contract of franshise»; 4 - Conclusions;
Resumo:
1 – Importância e actualidade do instituto. 2 – Noção de contrato. Sua disciplina no Código Civil. 3 – Relações contratuais de facto. 4 – Princípios fundamentais do regime dos contratos. 5 – Princípio da liberdade contratual. 6 – Princípio do consensualismo. 7 – Princípio da boa fé. A responsabilidade pré-contratual. 8 – Princípio da força vinculativa. 9 – Contratos unilaterais ou não sinalagmáticos e bilaterais ou sinalagmáticos. Contratos gratuitos e onerosos. Contratos cumulativos e aleatórios. 10 – Contratos mistos. União de contratos ou coligação de contratos. 11 – Contrato-promessa. 12 – Pacto de preferência. 13 - Alguns problemas e “contratos em especial”, a título enunciativo, relacionados com as actividades de Gestão, Banca e Seguros: “aspectos contratuais” de direito civil e de direito comercial. § 1 - Importance and actuality of the institute. 2 - Contract notion. Its disciplines in the portuguese Civil Code. 3 – Contractual relations of fact. 4 - Basic principles of the regimen of contracts. 5 - Principle of the contractual freedom. 6 - Principle of “consensualism”. 7 - Principle of the "good faith". The pre-contractual liability. 8 - Principle of the obligatory force (binding). 9 - Unilateral or not bilateral contracts. Free and onerous contracts. Cumulative and random contracts.
Resumo:
When companies opt for information systems (IS) outsourcing, within the set of contracted services, they can contract their entire service needs to onshore suppliers or to offshore companies, or part of these services can be contracted to onshore suppliers and the other part to offshore suppliers. The offshore outsourcing reveals itself nowadays as an important strategic option to IS management optimization. This paper presents and discusses the main results of a survey that was carried out in Portugal to determine several aspects of offshore practice in large companies. It allowed the identification of the services more frequently contracted, the most common motivations for choosing offshore suppliers and the main risks perceived by companies. This research contributes to a better understanding of the IS offshore market, enabling client companies and vendors to improve their strategic business action.
Resumo:
É importante chamar a atenção das possíveis diferenças entre o contrato de franquia e o contrato de agência no que diz respeito também ao problema da resolução em termos mais gerais ou em termos mais concretos; 1 – Sumário do Acórdão do Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, de 25 de Janeiro de 2011; 2 – Texto completo do Acórdão do Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, de 25 de Janeiro de 2011, Juiz Conselheiro Garcia CALEJO (Relator), Juiz Conselheiro Hélder ROQUE e Juiz Conselheiro Sebastião PÓVOAS: cfr. http://www.dgsi.pt , 21 de Abril de 2011; 3 – Anotação; 3.1 – Introdução à anotação; 3.2 – A questão da resolução em termos gerais; 3.3 – A questão da resolução no «contrato atípico de franquia»; 4 – Conclusões; Abstract: is important to draw attention to potential differences between the franchise agreement and agency agreement with regard also to the resolution problem in more general terms or in more concrete terms; 1 - Summary of the Sentence of the Supreme Court of Justice, 25 of January of 2011; 2 - Complete text of the Sentence of the Supreme Court of Justice, 25 of January of 2011, Advising Judge Garcia CALEJO (Reporter), Advising Judge Hélder ROQUE and Advising Juiz Sebastião PÓVOAS: cfr. http://www.dgsi.pt , 21 of April of 2011; 3 - Notation; 3.1 - Introduction to the notation; 3.2 - The question of the resolution in general terms; 3.3 - The question of the resolution in the «atypical contract of franshise»; 4 - Conclusions;
Resumo:
Paulo Mota Pinto é licenciado, mestre e doutor em ciências jurídico-civilísticas pela Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Coimbra. Assistimos às suas provas de Doutoramento em 16/1/2008: “Interesse Contratual Negativo e Interesse Contratual Positivo”. Abstract: Paulo Mota Pinto is licensed, Master and Doctor of Legal and Civil Sciences, Faculty of Law, University of Coimbra. Watched their PhD evidence 16/01/2008: "Interest Contract Contract Positive Negative Interest".
Resumo:
is important to draw attention to potential differences between the franchise agreement and agency agreement with regard also to the resolution problem in more general terms or in more concrete terms; 1 - Summary of the Sentence of the Supreme Court of Justice, 25 of January of 2011; 2 - Complete text of the Sentence of the Supreme Court of Justice, 25 of January of 2011, Advising Judge Garcia CALEJO (Reporter), Advising Judge Hélder ROQUE and Advising Juiz Sebastião PÓVOAS: cfr. http://www.dgsi.pt , 21 of April of 2011; 3 - Notation; 3.1 - Introduction to the notation; 3.2 - The question of the resolution in general terms; 3.3 - The question of the resolution in the «atypical contract of franshise»; 4 - Conclusions;