1 resultado para Health technology evaluation
em CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (3)
- Aberdeen University (15)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (119)
- Archive of European Integration (25)
- Aston University Research Archive (8)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (6)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (24)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (22)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (82)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (41)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Brunel University (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (16)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (7)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (4)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (5)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (39)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (11)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (2)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (16)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (7)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (16)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (4)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (19)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (3)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (4)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (37)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (15)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (10)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (41)
- Universidad de Alicante (6)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (9)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (6)
- Universidade do Minho (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (11)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (32)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (9)
- University of Connecticut - USA (4)
- University of Michigan (31)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (111)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- University of Washington (8)
Resumo:
This article presents a research work, the goal of which was to achieve a model for the evaluation of data quality in institutional websites of health units in a broad and balanced way. We have carried out a literature review of the available approaches for the evaluation of website content quality, in order to identify the most recurrent dimensions and the attributes, and we have also carried out a Delphi method process with experts in order to reach an adequate set of attributes and their respective weights for the measurement of content quality. The results obtained revealed a high level of consensus among the experts who participated in the Delphi process. On the other hand, the different statistical analysis and techniques implemented are robust and attach confidence to our results and consequent model obtained.