Style and performance of international socially responsible funds in Europe

This paper analyses the performance and investment styles of internationally oriented Socially Responsible Investment (SRI)funds, domiciled in eight European markets, in comparison with characteristics-matched conventional funds. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first multi-country study, focused on international SRI funds (investing in Global and in European equities), to combine the matched-pairs approach with the use of robust conditional multi-factor performance evaluation models, which allow for both time-varying alphas and betas and also control for home biases and spurious regression biases.In general, the results show that differences in the performance of international SRI funds and their conventional peers are not statistically significant. Regarding investment styles, SRI and conventional funds exhibit similar factor exposures in most cases. In addition,conventional benchmarks present a higher explaining power of SRI fund returns than SRI benchmarks. Our results also show significant differences in the investment styles of SRI funds according to whether they use “best-in-class” screening strategies or not. When compared to SRI funds that employ simple negative and/or positive screens, SRI “best-in-class” funds present significantly lower exposures to small caps and momentum strategies and significantly higher exposures to local stocks.

Performance of european socially responsible funds during market crises: evidence from France

This paper investigates the performance, investment styles andmanagerial abilities of French socially responsible investment (SRI) funds investing in Europe during crisis and non-crisis periods. Our results show that SRI funds significantly underperformcharacteristics-matched conventional funds during non-crisis periods, but match the performance of their peers duringmarket downturns. The underperformance of SRI funds during good economic states is driven by funds that use negative screens, since funds that use only positive screens performsimilarly to conventional funds across differentmarket conditions. SRI and conventional funds showsignificant differences in risk exposures during non-crisis periods but exhibit much more similar investment styles during crises. Furthermore,we find little evidence of significant differences inmanagerial abilities during bad economic states. Yet, during non-crisis periods, SRI and conventional fund managers exhibit significantly different style-timing abilities and these differences are also related to screening strategies.

Foucault’s Perspective of Performance Appraisal in Public Administration

The main purpose of performance appraisal in organizations is, or should be, to improve the engagement, learning process and progress of the employees and to align individual with team and organizational performance. However, performance appraisal can also be interpreted as an instrument of normalization, discipline and surveillance. This study thus aims to explore and discuss the complex schema of intrinsic and extrinsic objectives of performance appraisal system of the Portuguese public organizations (SIADAP - Performance Evaluation Integrated System). We have developed an exploratory and qualitative case study to capture appraisers and appraises perceptions. The data were analyzed in light of foucauldian theories. According to the qualitative data, namely the discourses of the appraisers and their subordinates, the SIADAP is seen as an instrument of control and dominance that aims to introduce political rationalities, limiting the career progression of the employees. Though some key points of Foucault’s perspective were identified, foucauldian framework revealed some limitations to capture all the complexity inherent to performance appraisal. This study opens new perspectives about the SIADAP and can be of major importance as far as political reflection about performance appraisal in public organizations is concerned.

O Balanced Scored como ferramenta de gestão estratégica na Clínica Oftalmológica Dr. Miguel Sousa Neves, Lda.

A sociedade está cada vez mais complexa, sendo notória a preocupação por parte das organizações no que respeita à qualidade dos serviços prestados. Tal como nas outras atividades, a atenção às mais variadas alterações internas e externas por parte das organizações que prestam cuidados de saúde deve ser uma constante, garantindo assim uma rápida e eficaz resposta aos novos desafios. Neste contexto, as organizações de saúde vêem-se obrigadas a criar e utilizar modelos de gestão mais direcionados aos seus objetivos concretos de forma a atingir os fins que visionaram sendo o Balanced Scorecard (BSC) um dos instrumentos mais vocacionados para este fim. Esta ferramenta, criada por Kaplan e Norton, visa a tradução da estratégia e missão de uma organização em objetivos e medidas divididas por quatro perspetivas diferentes: financeira, clientes, processos internos e aprendizagem e crescimento. O BSC é um modelo bastante flexível e o seu sucesso é reconhecido perante o mundo académico e empresarial. Neste sentido, foi desenvolvida uma proposta de implementação de um BSC para a Clínica Oftalmológica Dr. Miguel Sousa Neves, Lda.. Desta forma, foi definida e proposta uma ferramenta de gestão estratégica, permitindo também destacar um conjunto de melhorias que a mesma poderá trazer à organização. O método de estudo adotado foi o estudo de caso tendo sido realizada uma clarificação das orientações estratégicas da organização em questão através da definição da sua visão, missão e valores e, de seguida, a definição dos objetivos estratégicos e seleção dos indicadores de desempenho para cada perspetiva, garantindo assim o seu alinhamento. Por fim, foi delineado o mapa estratégico onde se apresentam as principais relações de causa-efeito entre as várias perspetivas do BSC. Verificou-se que a organização em análise tem os principais pilares do BSC – missão, valores e visão - bem definidos, tal como uma cultura aberta e comunicação clara, transparente e fluída. Estes elementos são muito relevantes para o início do processo de aplicação do BSC, uma vez que podem facilitar a compreensão e a aceitação do mesmo por parte das pessoas que trabalham na organização. O mapa estratégico desenhado para a Clínica Oftalmológica Dr. Miguel Sousa Neves, Lda. apresenta-se como uma ferramenta útil para a mesma nomeadamente ao fornecer aos funcionários uma linha clara da visão sobre a forma como as suas funções estão ligadas aos objetivos globais da organização; ao definir prioridades; ao identificar, racionalizar e alinhar as diversas iniciativas; ao ligar a estratégia com a afetação dos recursos disponíveis, orientando-os para o apoio ao cumprimento dos objetivos estratégicos da organização e satisfação das necessidades dos utentes; e ao incentivar a aprendizagem e a melhoria contínua dos colaboradores e da organização como um todo. Face ao exposto, o BSC poderá permitir à Clínica concentrar-se nas suas questões essenciais, estabelecendo as relações de causa-efeito para atingir os seus fins.

The impact of the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis on bond fund performance persistence: Evidence from a small market

We evaluate the impact of the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis on the performance and performance persistence of a survivorship bias-free sample of bond funds from a small market, identified as one of the most affected by this event, during the 2001–2012 period. Besides avoiding data mining, we also introduce a methodological innovation in assessing bond fund performance persistence. Our results show that bond funds underperform significantly both during crisis and non-crisis periods. Besides, we find strong evidence of performance persistence, for both short- and longer-term horizons, during non-crisis periods but not during the debt crisis. In this way, the persistence phenomenon in small markets seems to occur only during non-crisis periods and this is valuable information for bond fund investors to exploit.

Bond Fund Performance During Recessions and Expansions: Empirical Evidence from a Small Market

This paper provides the first investigation about bond mutual fund performance during recession and expansion periods separately. Based on multi-factor performance evaluation models, results show that bond funds significantly underperform the market during both phases of the business cycle. Nevertheless, unlike equity funds, bond funds exhibit considerably higher alphas during good economic states than during market downturns. These results, however, seem entirely driven by the global financial crisis subperiod. In contrast, during the recession associated to the Euro sovereign debt crisis, bond funds are able to accomplish neutral performance. This improved performance throughout the debt crisis seems to be related to more conservative investment strategies, which reflect an increase in managers’ risk aversion.