The introduction of the Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay in a groundwater monitoring program

The objective of this study was to verify the possible inclusion of the Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay in a groundwater monitoring program as a complementary assay to assess water quality. Groundwater samples belonging to seven wells from different types of aquifers were analyzed. Three different methods for sample preparation were used: membrane filtration; liquid-liquid and XAD-4 extraction. The filtered samples were tested using TA98, TA100, YG1041 and YG1042 and the water extracts only with TA98 and TA100. No mutagenic activity was observed in any of the 16 filtered samples tested. Out of the 10 samples analyzed using XAD-4 extraction, five showed mutagenic activity with potency ranging from 130 to 1500 revertants/L. Concerning the liquid-liquid extraction, from the 11 samples analyzed, 3 showed mutagenicity. The XAD-4 extraction was the most suitable sample preparation. TA98 without S9 was found to be the most sensitive testing condition. The wells presenting water samples with mutagenic activity belonged to unconfined aquifers, which are more vulnerable to contamination. The data suggest that Salmonella/microsome assay can be used as an efficient screening tool to monitor groundwater for mutagenic activity. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Production efficiency and financing of public health: an analysis of small municipalities in the state of Sao Paulo - Brazil

This paper measured the variations in performance of small municipalities in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil, regarding the technical efficiency in the use of public funds in public primary health care actions concerning the funding profile, in a scenario of fiscal federalism. Technical efficiency is one of the parameters of evaluation of public sector performance and was measured by means of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The correlation analysis of DEA score was used to verify possible associations between technical efficiency and the funding profile of expenses with health care. The results showed that 6.41% of the municipalities were considered efficient. They also showed that the level of municipality dependence to inter-governmental general purpose grants and the national health funding specific purpose grants have negative correlation with efficiency scores.

Obese Patients Have Stronger Peristalsis and Increased Acid Exposure in the Esophagus

Obesity is a risk factor for GERD and a potential modulator of esophageal motility. To assess whether obese patients differ from non-obese patients in terms of esophageal motility and reflux. Patients (n = 332) were categorized in GERD and controls after clinical assessment, esophageal manometry, and pH monitoring. Non-obese (BMI 16-29.9) and obese (BMI 30-68) were compared in regard of distal esophageal amplitude (DEA), LES pressure (LESP), manometric diagnosis, and esophageal acid exposure (EAE). Obese showed higher DEA in both controls (122 +/- A 53 vs. 97 +/- A 36 mmHg, p = 0.041) and GERD patients (109 +/- A 38 vs. 94 +/- A 46 mmHg, p < 0.001), higher LESP in GERD patients (20.5 +/- A 10.6 vs. 18.2 +/- A 10.6 mmHg, p = 0.049), higher frequency of nutcracker esophagus in controls (30 vs. 0%, p = 0.001), lower frequency of ineffective motility in GERD patients (6 vs. 20%, p = 0.001), and higher EAE in both controls [total EAE: 1.6% (0.7-5.1) vs. 0.9% (0.2-2.4), p = 0.027] and GERD patients [upright EAE: 6.5% (3.8-11.1) vs. 5.2% (1.5-10.6), p = 0.048]. Multiple linear regression showed that BMI was associated either with EAE (p < 0.001), DEA (p = 0.006), or LESP (in men, p = 0.007). Obese patients differed from non-obese in terms of esophageal motility and reflux, regardless of the presence of GERD. Obese patients showed stronger peristalsis and increased acid exposure in the esophagus.