Estimativas do teor de umidade empregando o método GPR: uma avaliação comparativa em experimentos de laboratório e campo

Este trabalho faz uma análise das estimativas de teores de umidade obtidas com o método Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) comparativamente às determinadas com os métodos Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) e gravimétrico. Os dados foram obtidos em dois experimentos diferentes: um experimento controlado em laboratório buscando reproduzir um meio homogêneo onde foram obtidas as medidas de umidade com GPR (antenas de 1 GHz) e TDR, e outro experimento de campo onde foram obtidos dados com GPR (antenas de 200 MHz) e de amostras de solos do local. Para a obtenção das estimativas a partir do método GPR foram analisados os eventos relativos à onda de transmissão direta entre as antenas, onda refratada criticamente e onda refletida em interfaces com diferentes propriedades elétricas.O GPR mostrou-se sensível às variações de umidades presentes nos dois experimentos e apresentou boa correlação com os dados obtidos com TDR (REQM de0,007 m³m-3) e das amostras (REQM de 0,039 m³m-3).

Geophysical investigation using resistivity and GPR methods: a case study of a lubricant oil waste disposal area in the city of Ribeiro Preto, So Paulo, Brazil

Geophysics has been shown to be effective in identifying areas contaminated by waste disposal, contributing to the greater efficiency of soundings programs and the installation of monitoring wells. In the study area, four trenches were constructed with a total volume of about 25,000 m(3). They were almost totally filled with re-refined lubricating oil waste for approximately 25 years. No protection liners were used in the bottoms and laterals of the disposal trenches. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the potential of the resistivity and ground penetrating radar (GPR) methods in characterizing the contamination of this lubricant oil waste disposal area in Ribeiro Preto, SP, situated on the geological domain of the basalt spills of the Serra Geral Formation and the sandstones of the Botucatu Formation. Geophysical results were shown in 2D profiles. The geophysical methods used enabled the identification of geophysical anomalies, which characterized the contamination produced by the trenches filled with lubricant oil waste. Conductive anomalies (smaller than 185 Omega m) immediately below the trenches suggest the action of bacteria in the hydrocarbons, as has been observed in several sites contaminated by hydrocarbons in previously reported cases in the literature. It was also possible to define the geometry of the trenches, as evidenced by the GPR method. Direct sampling (chemical analysis of the soil and the water in the monitoring well) confirmed the contamination. In the soil analysis, low concentrations of several polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were found, mainly naphthalene and phenanthrene. In the water samples, an analysis verified contamination of the groundwater by lead (Pb). The geophysical methods used in the investigation provided an excellent tool for environmental characterization in this study of a lubricant oil waste disposal area, and could be applied in the study of similar areas.

Comparing detection and location performance of perpendicular and parallel broadside GPR antenna orientations

GPR (Ground Penetrating Radar) results are shown for perpendicular broadside and parallel broadside antenna orientations. Performance in detection and localization of concrete tubes and steel tanks is compared as a function of acquisition configuration. The comparison is done using 100 MHz and 200 MHz center frequency antennas. All tubes and tanks are buried at the geophysical test site of IAG/USP in Sao Paulo city, Brazil. The results show that the long steel pipe with a 38-mm diameter was well detected with the perpendicular broadside configuration. The concrete tubes were better detected with the parallel broadside configuration, clearly showing hyperbolic diffraction events from all targets up to 2-m depth. Steel tanks were detected with the two configurations. However, the parallel broadside configuration was generated to a much lesser extent an apparent hyperbolic reflection corresponding to constructive interference of diffraction hyperbolas of adjacent targets placed at the same depth. Vertical concrete tubes and steel tanks were better contained with parallel broadside antennas, where the apexes of the diffraction hyperbolas better corresponded to the horizontal location of the buried target disposition. The two configurations provide details about buried targets emphasizing how GPR multi-component configurations have the potential to improve the subsurface image quality as well as to discriminate different buried targets. It is judged that they hold some applicability in geotechnical and geoscientific studies. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Uso da manta térmica na prevenção da hipotermia intraoperatória

OBJETIVO: A hipotermia é prejudicial no período perioperatório. Não há consenso sobre o melhor método de aquecimento ativo e nem sobre o melhor período para fazê-lo. Este estudo teve como objetivo primário verificar a eficácia de diferentes períodos de utilização da manta térmica à temperatura de 38°C, como método de prevenção da hipotermia intraoperatória. Como objetivo secundário avaliou-se os efeitos adversos do uso da manta térmica na temperatura de 38°C. MÉTODOS: Foram comparados quatro grupos de 15 pacientes submetidos a operações ortopédicas. No grupo controle (Gcont) os pacientes não utilizaram manta térmica, nos grupos pré (Gpré), intra (Gintra) e total (Gtotal), os pacientes utilizaram manta térmica a 38ºC, respectivamente, durante 30 minutos antes da indução anestésica, após a indução anestésica até 120 minutos e antes e após a indução. Foram avaliados: temperatura central (timpânica), periférica (pele), da sala cirúrgica, variação das condições hemodinâmicas e efeitos adversos do aquecimento. RESULTADOS: O Gtotal foi o único grupo que não teve variação significativa da temperatura central. A temperatura central dos pacientes do grupo Gtotal foi significativamente maior (p <0,05) do que a dos outros grupos aos 60 e 120 min após a indução. Os pacientes dos grupos Gcont, Gpré e Gintra apresentaram hipotermia aos 60 min. CONCLUSÃO: O uso da manta térmica com fluxo de ar aquecido foi eficaz como método de prevenção da hipotermia intraoperatória quando foi empregada desde 30 min antes da indução anestésica até 120 min após o início da anestesia. Nas condições do estudo não ocorreram eventos adversos.

Use of alprostadil, a stable prostaglandin E(1) analogue, for the attenuation of rat skeletal muscle ischemia and reperfusion injury

Aim. Some stable prostaglandin analogues such as alprostadil have been used to attenuate the deleterious effects of ischemia and reperfusion injury. The aim of this paper was to test if alprostadil can decrease the ischemia- reperfusion injury in rat skeletal muscle using muscular enzymes as markers, such as aspartate aminotransferase (AST), creatine kinase (CPK), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH); degeneration products of cell membrane-malondialdehyde (MDA) and muscle glycogen storage. Methods. Thirty male Wistar rats were used in a model of hind limb ischemia achieved by infrarenal aortic cross-clamping. The animals were randomized into three equal groups (N=10) submitted to 5 hours of ischemia followed by one hour of reperfusion. The first group (control) received continuous intravenous infusion of saline solution and the second group (preischemia, GPI) received continuous intravenous infusion of alprostadil throughout the experiment starting 20 minutes before the aortic cross-clamping. The third group, prereperfusion (GPR), received alprostadil only during the reperfusion period, with intravenous infusion being started 10 min before the clamp release. Results. There was no difference in CPK, LDH, AST or tissue glycogen values between groups. However, a significant elevation in MDA was observed in the GPI and GPR groups compared to the control group, with no difference between the GPI and GPR. Conclusion. Under conditions of partial skeletal muscle ischemia, alprostadil did not reduce the release of muscular enzymes, the consumption of tissue glycogen or the effects of ischemia and reperfusion on the cell membrane, characterized by lipid peroxidation.

GLOBAL POSTURAL REEDUCATION AND STATIC STRETCHING EXERCISES IN THE TREATMENT OF MYOGENIC TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS: A RANDOMIZED STUDY

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare 2 different interventions, global postural reeducation (GPR) and static stretching exercises (SS), in the treatment of women with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Methods: A total of 28 subjects with TMDs were randomized into 2 treatment groups: GPR, where therapy involved muscle global chain stretching, or SS, with conventional static stretching; but only 24 completed the study. Eight treatment sessions lasting 40 minutes each (weekly) were performed. Assessments were conducted at baseline, immediately after treatment end, and 2 months later. Measurements included pain intensity at the temporomandibular joint, headache, cervicalgia, teeth clenching, ear symptoms, restricted sleep, and difficulties for mastication, using a visual analogue scale. In addition, electromyographic activity and pain thresholds were measured at the masseter, anterior temporalis, stemocleidomastoid, and upper trapezius muscles. Two-way analysis of variance with Tukey post hoc test was used for between-group comparisons. Significance level was .05. Results: Comparing the pain assessments using the visual analogue scale, no significant differences were seen with the exception of severity of headaches at treatment end (GPR, 3.92 +/- 2.98 cm; SS, 1.64 +/- 1.66 cm; P < .024). In addition, no significant differences were seen for pain thresholds and for electromyographic activity (P > .05). Conclusions: For the subjects in this study, both GPR and SS were similarly effective for the treatment of TMDs with muscular component. They equally reduced pain intensity, increased pain thresholds, and decreased electromyographic activity. (J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2010;33:500-507)