Anti-C1q Antibodies in Juvenile-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

The objective of this study was to evaluate the presence of anti-C1q antibodies Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein Research Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil in 67 juvenile Systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE) patients and 26 healthy controls and to assess the association of these antibodies with disease activity, nephritis, and presence of anti-double-stranded (ds)DNA. Anti-C1q antibodies were detected by ELISA. A higher frequency of anti-C1q antibodies was observed in JSLE patients compared to controls (20% vs. 0%, P = 0.016). Specificity of these antibodies was 100% [95% confidence interval (CI) 86.7-100%] and sensitivity was 19.4% (95% CI 10.7-30.8%) for a lupus diagnosis. The median anti-C1q antibodies was higher in JSLE patients compared to controls [median (range) 9.4 (5.5-127) vs. 7.3 (5-20) units, P = 0.004]. Remarkably, a positive Spearman`s coefficient was found between anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q units (r = 0.42, P = 0.0004, 95% CI 0.19-0.60). Our results confirm a low frequency of anti-C1q antibody in our lupus populations, but the presence of anti-C1q antibodies appears to be a good marker for JSLE diagnosis.

Alterations in Cytokine Profile and Dendritic Cells Subsets in Peripheral Blood of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients before and after Biologic Therapy

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by chronic joint inflammation and continuous immune cell infiltration in the synovium. These changes are linked to inflammatory cytokine release, leading to eventual destruction of cartilage and bone. During the last decade new therapeutic modalities have improved the prognosis, with the introduction of novel biological response modifiers including anti-TNF alpha CTLA4Ig and, more recently, anti-IL6. In the present study we looked at the immunological effects of these three forms of therapy. Serum, obtained from patients with RA was analyzed for TNF alpha, IL6, IL10, IFN gamma, and VEGF, and in parallel, circulating plasmacytoid and myeloid dendritic cells (DC) were enumerated before and after three infusions of the respective biological treatments. After treatment with anti-IL6, we found a significant reduction of IL6 and TNF alpha levels and the percentage of both DC subsets decreased. Although the results did not reach statistical significance for anti-TNF alpha treatment, similar trends were observed. Meanwhile, CTLA4Ig therapy led to the reduction IFN gamma levels only. None of the treatments modified significantly VEGF or IL10 levels. These findings may explain why patients with RA improve more rapidly on IL-6 therapy than with the other two modalities.

The Alzheimer`s Association external quality control program for cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers

Background: The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers amyloid beta (A beta)-42, total-tau (T-tau), and phosphorylated-tau (P-tau) demonstrate good diagnostic accuracy for Alzheimer`s disease (AD). However, there are large variations in biomarker measurements between studies, and between and within laboratories. The Alzheimer`s Association has initiated a global quality control program to estimate and monitor variability of measurements, quantify batch-to-batch assay variations, and identify sources of variability. In this article, we present the results from the first two rounds of the program. Methods: The program is open for laboratories using commercially available kits for A beta, T-tau, or P-tau. CSF samples (aliquots of pooled CSF) are sent for analysis several times a year from the Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory at the Molndal campus of the University of Gothenburg, Sweden. Each round consists of three quality control samples. Results: Forty laboratories participated. Twenty-six used INNOTEST enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits, 14 used Luminex xMAP with the INNO-BIA AlzBio3 kit (both measure A beta-(1-42), P-tau(181P), and T-tau), and 5 used Mesa Scale Discovery with the A beta triplex (A beta N-42, A beta N-40, and A beta N-38) or T-tau kits. The total coefficients of variation between the laboratories were 13% to 36%. Five laboratories analyzed the samples six times on different occasions. Within-laboratory precisions differed considerably between biomarkers within individual laboratories. Conclusions: Measurements of CSF AD biomarkers show large between-laboratory variability, likely caused by factors related to analytical procedures and the analytical kits. Standardization of laboratory procedures and efforts by kit vendors to increase kit performance might lower variability, and will likely increase the usefulness of CSF AD biomarkers. (C) 2011 The Alzheimer`s Association. All rights reserved.