Does rapid maxillary expansion increase nasopharyngeal space and improve nasal airway resistance?

Objective: To evaluate the effect of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) on the dimension of the nasopharyngeal space and its relation to nasal airway resistance. Methods: Twenty-five school-age children (from 7 to 10 year-old) with mouth and/or mixed breathing, with mixed dentition and uni- or bilateral posterior crossbite involving the deciduous canines and the first permanent molars, were evaluated. RME was placed and remained during 90 days. Rhinomanometry and orthodontic documentation were performed at four different times, i.e., before (T(1)), immediately after (T(2)), 90 days (T(3)) and 30 months (T(4)) after RME. Results: Differences in nasopharyngeal area and in nasal airway resistance were observed only 30 months after RME, and could be explained by facial growth, and not because of the orthodontic procedure. Conclusion: RME does not influence on nasopharyngeal area or nasal airway resistance in long-term evaluation. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Long-term effects of rapid maxillary expansion on nasal area and nasal airway resistance

Background: Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) may improve the nasal respiratory pattern This study was performed to evaluate the effect of RME on the nasal cavity by acoustic rhinometry and computed rhinomanometry and to determine nasal and maxillary width by posteroanterior cephalometric radiography, up to 30 months after the orthodontic procedure Methods: Twenty-seven children with oral breathing, ranging in age from 7 to 70 years, and with mixed dentition were selected The children had unior bilateral posterior crossbite involving deciduous canines and the first permanent molars All subjects were submitted to nasofibroscopy, acoustic rhinometry, and computed rhinomanometry and posteroanterior cephalometric radiography at four different tunes, i e, before expansion, immediately, 90 days and 30 months after expansion Results: The mean linear left-to-right nasal cavity lateral prominence and left-to-right jugal ponds cephalometric measures increased considerably after expansion and this increase was maintained throughout the period of evaluation There was an immediate significant decrease in nasal resistance, up to 90 days after RME, but the nasal resistance increased 30 months after the procedure The acoustic rhinometry results did not show any difference in values throughout time Conclusion: RME significantly increased nasal and maxillary width as measured by frontal cephalometry, but the nasal mucosal effects were more subtle Also, the influence of RME on nasal resistance was not stable, and nasal resistance values returned to close to the initial ones after 30 months (Am J Rhinol Allergy 24, 161-165, 2010, doi 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3440)