Speech intelligibility with and without noise in individuals exposed to electronic music

Audiometry is the main way with which hearing is evaluated, because it is a universal and standardized test. Speech tests are difficult to standardize due to the variables involved, their performance in the presence of competitive noise is of great importance. Aim: To characterize speech intelligibility in silence and in competitive noise from individuals exposed to electronically amplified music. Material and Method: It was performed with 20 university students who presented normal hearing thresholds. The speech recognition rate (SRR) was performed after fourteen hours of sound rest after the exposure to electronically amplified music and once again after sound rest, being studied in three stages: without competitive noise, in the presence of Babble-type competitive noise, in monotic listening, in signal/ noise ratio of + 5 dB and with the signal/ noise ratio of 5 dB. Results: There was greater damage in the SRR after exposure to the music and with competitive noise, and as the signal/ noise ratio decreases, the performance of individuals in the test also decreased. Conclusion: The inclusion of competitive noise in the speech tests in the audiological routine is important, because it represents the real disadvantage experienced by individuals in daily listening.

Caracterização da fala de indivíduos submetidos à palatoplastia primária

OBJETIVOS: Descrever as características de fala de indivíduos submetidos à palatoplastia primária; relacioná-las com tipo de fissura, técnica cirúrgica e idade na ocasião da cirurgia; e descrever as condutas fonoaudiológicas após a cirurgia. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo de 167 casos, de ambos os gêneros, com fissura labiopalatina, submetidos à palatoplastia primária. Foram coletadas informações relativas ao tipo de fissura, idade na palatoplastia, técnica cirúrgica, e as análises subjetivas sobre as características da fala, realizadas por fonoaudiólogas. RESULTADOS: Na avaliação perceptiva da fala após a cirurgia, encontrou-se inteligibilidade de fala alterada (46%), ressonância hipernasal (33%), articulações compensatórias (26%), emissão de ar nasal (14%), mímica facial (11%) e fraca pressão aérea intra-oral (8%). Na associação entre a ressonância e as articulações compensatórias com tipo de fissura, técnica cirúrgica e faixa etária, não houve diferença significativa. A conduta mais frequentemente tomada foi a de terapia fonoaudiológica (38%), para correção das articulações compensatórias e/ou outras alterações. CONCLUSÃO: A maioria dos indivíduos apresentou ressonância equilibrada ou hipernasalidade aceitável e ausência de articulações compensatória, independente do tipo de fissura, da técnica cirúrgica e da faixa etária, embora não tenha ocorrido diferença significativa. Dentre as condutas adotadas após a primeira avaliação pós-palatoplastia primária, a terapia fonoaudiológica foi a mais frequente.

Speech Evaluation After Palatal Augmentation in Patients Undergoing Glossectomy

Objective: To assess, in patients undergoing glossectomy, the influence of the palatal augmentation prosthesis on the speech intelligibility and acoustic spectrographic characteristics of the formants of oral vowels in Brazilian Portuguese, specifically the first 3 formants (F1 [/a,e,u/], F2 [/o,o,u/], and F3 [/a,o/]). Design: Speech evaluation with and without a palatal augmentation prosthesis using blinded randomized listener judgments. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Thirty-six patients (33 men and 3 women) aged 30 to 80 (mean [SD], 53.9 [10.5]) years underwent glossectomy (14, total glossectomy; 12, total glossectomy and partial mandibulectomy; 6, hemiglossectomy; and 4, subtotal glossectomy) with use of the augmentation prosthesis for at least 3 months before inclusion in the study. Main Outcome Measures: Spontaneous speech intel-ligibility (assessed by expert listeners using a 4-category scale) and spectrographic formants assessment. Results: We found a statistically significant improvement of spontaneous speech intelligibility and the average number of correctly identified syllables with the use of the prosthesis (P < .05). Statistically significant differences occurred for the F1 values of the vowels /a,e,u/; for F2 values, there was a significant difference of the vowels /o,o,u/; and for F3 values, there was a significant difference of the vowels la,61 (P < .001). Conclusions: The palatal augmentation prosthesis improved the intelligibility of spontaneous speech and syllables for patients who underwent glossectomy. It also increased the F2 and F3 values for all vowels and the F I values for the vowels /o,o,u/. This effect brought the values of many vowel formants closer to normal.