The pst operon of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli enhances bacterial adherence to epithelial cells

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) adheres in vivo and in vitro to epithelial cells. Two main adhesins, the bundle-forming pilus and intimin, encoded by the Up operon and eae, respectively, are responsible for the localized and the intimate adherence phenotypes. Deletion of the pst operon of EPEC abolishes the transport of inorganic phosphate through the phosphate-specific transport system and causes the constitutive expression of the PHO regulon genes. In the absence of pst there is a decrease in the expression of the main EPEC adhesins and a reduction in bacterial adherence to epithelial cells in vitro. This effect is not related to PHO constitutivity, because a Delta pst phoB double mutant that is defective in the transcription of the PHO genes also displayed low levels of adherence and expression of adhesins. Likewise, a PHO-constitutive phoR mutation did not affect bacterial adherence. The expression of the per operon, which encodes the Up and ler regulators PerA and PerC, is also negatively affected by the pst deletion. Overall, the data presented here demonstrate that the pst operon of EPEC plays a positive role in the bacterial adherence mechanism by increasing the expression of perA and perC and consequently the transcription of bfp and eae.

Microbiopsies of Surface Dental Enamel as a Tool to Measure Body Lead Burden

Lead (Pb) poisoning is preventable but continues to be a public health problem in several countries. Measuring Pb in the surface dental enamel (SDE) using microbiopsies is a rapid, safe, and painless procedure. There are different protocols to perform these microbiopsies, but the reliability of dental enamel lead levels (DELL) determination is dependent upon biopsy depth (BD). It is established that DELL decrease from the outermost superficial layer to the inner layer of dental enamel. The aim of this study was to determine DELL obtained by two different microbiopsy techniques on SDE termed protocol I and protocol II. Two consecutive enamel layers were removed from the same subject group (n = 138) for both protocols. Protocol I consisted of a biopsied site with a diameter of 4 mm after the application of 10 l HCl for 35 s. Protocol II involved a biopsied site of 1.6 mm diameter after application of 5 l HCl for 20 s. The results demonstrated that there were no significant differences for BD and DELL between homologous teeth using protocol I. However, there was a significant difference between DELL in the first and second layers using both protocols. Further, the BD in protocol II overestimated DELL values. In conclusion, SDE analyzed by microbiopsy is a reliable biomarker in protocol I, but the chemical method to calculate BD in protocol II appeared to be inadequate for measurement of DELL. Thus, DELL could not be compared among studies that used different methodologies for SDE microbiopsies.