Influence of the menstrual cycle on the pressure pain threshold of masticatory muscles in patients with masticatory myofascial pain

Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the menstrual cycle and oral contraceptive (OC) intake on the pressure pain threshold (PPT) of masticatory muscles in patients with masticatory myofascial pain (MFP). Study design. The sample was composed of 36 women, divided into 4 groups, according to the presence of MFP and the intake of OC (15 patients had MFP [7 taking OC] and 21 were pain-free controls [8 taking OC]). The algometer-based PPT of masseter and temporalis, and the record of subjective pain by visual analog scale (VAS) were determined during 2 consecutives menstrual cycles at 4 phases (menstrual, follicular, periovulatory, and luteal). A 3-way ANOVA for repeated measurements, Kruskal-Wallis, Friedman, and Dunn tests, with a 5% significant level analyzed the data. Results. PPT was significantly lower in MFP patients when compared with controls throughout the experiment (P < .001). The menstrual phases did not influence PPT (P > .05), while the intake of OC seems to raise PPT levels for the left temporalis (P = .01) and right masseter (P = .04). VAS was, in general, higher at the menstrual phase Conclusions. Different phases of the menstrual cycle have no influence on PPT values, regardless of the presence of a previous condition, as masticatory myofascial pain, while the intake of OC is associated with decreased levels of reported pain.

Comparison of oral versus sublingual piroxicam during postoperative pain management after lower third molar extraction

In this study, 53 patients received piroxicam, administered orally or sublingually, after undergoing removal of symmetrically positioned lower third molars, during two separate appointments. This study used a randomized, blind, cross-over protocol. Objective and subjective parameters were recorded for comparison of postoperative results for 7 days after surgery. Patients treated with oral or sublingual piroxicam reported low postoperative pain scores. The patients who received piroxicam orally took a similar average amount of analgesic rescue medication compared with patients who received piroxicam sublingually (p > 0.05). Patients exhibited similar values for mouth opening measured just before surgery and immediately following suture removal 7 days later (p > 0.05), and showed no significant differences between routes of piroxicam administration for swelling control during the second or seventh postoperative days (p > 0.05). In summary, pain, trismus and swelling after lower third molar extraction, independent of surgical difficulty, could be controlled by piroxicam 20 mg administered orally or sublingually and no significant differences were observed between the route of delivery used in this study.