Dry eye in childhood: Epidemiological and clinical aspects

Because dry eye disease is rare in children and its pathogenesis is less well known than in adults, its diagnosis is often overlooked. It can occur in association with a number of congenital, autoimmune, endocrine, and inflammatory disorders, or under certain environmental and nutritional conditions. In some cases, early detection allows the underlying cause of the dry eye to be successfully treated and eliminated. In other cases, the disease may represent a lifelong problem, whose proper management can prevent ulceration and scarring of the ocular surface. Because of the association of pediatric dry eye with other conditions, a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment is usually required. The purpose of this review is to enhance physician awareness of dry eye in children, to describe the most frequently associated conditions, and to discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic options available.

The Provisional Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation/American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism disease activity core set for the evaluation of response to therapy in juvenile dermatomyositis: A prospective validation study

Objective. To validate a core set of outcome measures for the evaluation of response to treatment in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis (DM). Methods. In 2001, a preliminary consensus-derived core set for evaluating response to therapy in juvenile DM was established. In the present study, the core set was validated through an evidence-based, large-scale data collection that led to the enrollment of 294 patients from 36 countries. Consecutive patients with active disease were assessed at baseline and after 6 months. The validation procedures included assessment of feasibility, responsiveness, discriminant and construct ability, concordce in the evaluation of response to therapy between physicians and parents, redundancy, internal consistency, and ability to predict a therapeutic response. Results. The following clinical measures were found to be feasible, and to have good construct validity, discriminative ability, and internal consistency; furthermore, they were not redundant, proved responsive to clinically important changes in disease activity, and were associated strongly with treatment outcome and thus were included in the final core set: 1) physician`s global assessment of disease activity, 2) muscle strength, 3) global disease activity measure, 4) parent`s global assessment of patient`s well-being, 5) functional ability, and 6) health-related quality of life. Conclusion. The members of the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation, with the endorsement of the American College of Rheumatology and the European Leauge Against Rheumatism, propose a core set of criteria for the evaluation of response of therapy that is scientifically and clinically relevant and statistically validated. The core set will help standardize the conduct and reporting of clinical trials and assist practitioners in deciding whether a child with juvenile DM has responded adequately to therapy.

Nasal allergies in the Latin American population: Results from the Allergies in Latin America survey

Allergies in Latin America is the first cross-national survey that describes the symptoms, impact, and treatment of nasal allergies (NAs) in individuals >= 4 years old in Latin America (LA). In total, 22,012 households across the Latin American countries of Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, and Venezuela were screened for children, adolescents, and adults with a diagnosis of NA and either symptoms or treatment in the past 12 months. A total of 1088 adults and 457 children and adolescents were included and the sample was probability based to ensure valid statistical inference to the population. Approximately 7% of the LA population was diagnosed with NAs with two of three respondents stating that their allergies were seasonal or intermittent in nature. A general practice physician or otolaryngologist diagnosed the majority of individuals surveyed. Nasal congestion was the most common and bothersome symptom of NAs. Sufferers indicated that their symptoms affected productivity and sleep and had a negative impact on quality of life. Two-thirds of patients reported taking some type of medication for their NAs, with a roughly equal percentage of patients reporting taking over-the-counter versus prescription medications. Changing medications was most commonly done in those reporting inadequate efficacy. The most common reasons cited for dissatisfaction with current medications were related to inadequate effectiveness, effectiveness wearing off with chronic use, failure to provide 24-hour relief, and bothersome side effects (e.g., unpleasant taste and retrograde drainage into the esophagus). Findings from this cross-national survey on NAs have confirmed a high prevalence of physician-diagnosed NAs and a considerable negative impact on daily quality of life and work productivity as well as substantial disease management challenges in LA. Through identification of disease impact on the LA population and further defining treatment gaps, clinicians in LA may better understand and treat NAs, thus leading to improvements in overall patient satisfaction and quality of life. (Allergy Asthma Proc 31:S9-S27, 2010; doi: 10.2500/aap.2010.31.3347)

COMPLEMENTARY EXAMS AND HEADACHES

Introduction. In view of the high prevalence of headache in the general population, the availability of well defined regarding the request of complementary exams is highly desirable. Aim. To analyze the criteria that will guide the physician requests of complementary exams during the investigation of headache. Patients and methods. The data were obtained by reviewing medical records of all patients who had been scheduled to be seen in a tertiary Headache Outpatient Clinic in 2004. Results. The exam most frequently requested was computed tomography of the head and the exams that most contributed to a change in clinical diagnosis or medical conduct were computed tomography of paranasal sinuses, simple rediography of paranasal sinuses. and magnetic resonance image of the brain. The exams that did not contribute to a change in the diagnosis or medical conduct were computed tomography and simple radiography of the cervical spine. As expected, the most expensive exams for the institution were computed tomography and magnetic resonance image. Conclusion. The importance of complementary exams in the investigation of headache is indisputable in many cases. Howerer, it is necessary the availability of more, studies that evaluate the request of complementay ; exams for headache patients. [REV NEUROL 2009: 48: 183-7]

Addressing overtreatment in patients with refractory epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre in Brazil

Background. Patients with refractory epilepsy often have impaired quality of life (QOL) as a consequence of seizures and adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs. We assessed the impact of adverse effects on QOL and the utility of a structured instrument to help the physician manage adverse effects in patients with refractory epilepsy. Methods. Clinical characteristics, drug treatment and adverse effects were evaluated in 102 patients with refractory epilepsy at a single tertiary referral centre. The Adverse Events Profile (AEP) and Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31 (QOLIE-31) questionnaires were completed at baseline and after six months. At baseline, patients with a high burden of adverse effects (AEP scores >= 45) were randomized to an intervention or control group. AEP scores in the intervention group were available to the physician as an instrument to help to reduce adverse effects. Results. Ninety-five patients (93.1%) were on polytherapy. Sixty-six completed the questionnaires and, of these, 43 (65.1%) had a high AE burden and were randomized to the intervention and control group. QOLIE-31 scores were inversely correlated with AEP scores at both visits. Among randomized patients, AEP scores tended to decrease between the baseline and the final visit without significant differences between groups (intervention group: 54.1 +/- 6.1 vs 51.1 +/- 9.1; control group: 55.8 +/- 5.8 vs 50.5 +/- 12.2). QOLIE-31 scores did not change substantially between visits (intervention group: 45.9 +/- 17.4 vs 48.4 +/- 14; control group: 47.5 +/- 15.7 vs 45.2 +/- 18.9). Conclusion. A significant proportion of patients had a high toxicity burden which had an impact on their QOL. Reduction of over-treatment is a difficult challenge which cannot be addressed solely by providing a structured assessment of adverse effects, but requires a more comprehensive approach aimed at optimizing the many components of the management strategy.