Why Not to Use Kidney Grafts From Elderly Donors

Background. Kidney transplantation is widely recognized as the best treatment in patients who require renal replacement therapy. Although considered a clinical and surgical triumph, it is also a source of frustration because of lack of donor organs and the growth of waiting lists. Strategies need to be developed to increase the supply of organs. One measure is use of expanded criteria for donation. Objective. To evaluate the effect of donor age on cadaver graft survival. Materials and Methods. We reviewed the medical records for 454 patients who underwent kidney transplantation with cadaver donors from April 1987 to December 2003. Results. Donor age had a significant effect on kidney transplant survival. Survival of grafts from donors aged 16 to 40 years (mean, 143.30 months) was significantly greater compared with that of grafts from donors older than 40 years (66.46 months) (P = .005). The HLA matching and cold ischemia time did not significantly affect transplant survival (P = .98 and P = .16, respectively). Conclusions. Kidneys from cadaver donors older than 40 years significantly compromised graft survival, generating a negative effect via early return of recipients to waiting lists and increasing the rate of repeat transplantation, risk of death, and unnecessary costs.

Relational learning in children with deafness and cochlear implants

This four-experiment series sought to evaluate the potential of children with neurosensory deafness and cochlear implants to exhibit auditory-visual and visual-visual stimulus equivalence relations within a matching-to-sample format. Twelve children who became deaf prior to acquiring language (prelingual) and four who became deaf afterwards (postlingual) were studied. All children learned auditory-visual conditional discriminations and nearly all showed emergent equivalence relations. Naming tests, conducted with a subset of the: children, showed no consistent relationship to the equivalence-test outcomes.. This study makes several contributions: to the literature on stimulus equivalence. First; it demonstrates that both pre- and postlingually deaf children-can: acquire auditory-visual equivalence-relations after cochlear implantation, thus demonstrating symbolic functioning. Second, it directs attention to a population that may be especially interesting for researchers seeking to analyze the relationship. between speaker and listener repertoires. Third, it demonstrates the feasibility of conducting experimental studies of stimulus control processes within the limitations of a hospital, which these children must visit routinely for the maintenance of their cochlear implants.