The in vitro assessment of the synergistic effects of antibiotics and wound dressings on biofilms from diabetic foot pathogens

The impact of biofilm in the effective control of wound microbiome is an ongoing dilemma which has seen the use of different treatment strategies. The effects of wound dressings and antibiotics on both planktonic bacteria and biofilms have been separately evaluated in previous studies. In this current study, the combined antimicrobial effects of some selected wound dressings (silver-impregnated: Acticoat and Silvercel; and honey-impregnated: Medihoney™ Apinate) and antibiotics (ceftazdime and levofloxacin) on Klebsiella pneumoniae and Proteus mirabilis in their quasi-biofilm state were assessed using zone of inhibition (ZOI) test. Before the addition of the wound dressings, bacterial suspension of 108 colony forming units per mL and different concentrations of ceftazidime and levofloxacin (256, 512, 1024 and 5120µg/mL) of a final volume of 1mL were inoculated on Mueller Hinton agar and allowed to dry. Wound dressings cut into circular shapes (2cm diameter) were aseptically placed on the agar plates and incubated at 35 – 37°C for 24 hours. ZOIs associated with Acticoat, Silvercel and Medihoney™ Apinate dressings were compared with that of Atrauman (non-medicated control) dressing. All three dressings showed significant (p < 0.05) biofilm-inhibiting activity against both bacteria at antibiotic concentrations of 1024 and 5120µg/mL with ZOI between 17.5 and 35mm.

Rights, Rationality and Reproduction: Balancing Interests in the Abortion Debate

As medical technology has advanced, so too have our attitudes towards the level of control we can or should expect to have over our procreative capacities. This creates a multidimensional problem for the law and family planning services in terms of access to services – whether to avoid conception or terminate a pregnancy – and the negligent provision of these services. These developments go to the heart of our perception of autonomy. Unsurprisingly, these matters also raise a moral dilemma for the law. Distinctively, discourse in this area is dominated by assertions of subjective moral value; in relation to life, to personal choice and to notions of the archetypal family. Against this, I stress that a model of objective morality can answer these challenging questions and resolve the inherent problems of legal regulation. Therefore, I argue that notions of autonomy must be based on a rational, action-based understanding of what it means to be a ‘moral agent’. I claim that from this we might support a legal standard, based on objective rational morality, which can frame our constitutional norms and our conception of justice in these contentious areas. This paper claims that the current regulation of abortion is outdated and requires radical reform. It proposes a scheme that would shift the choice towards the mother (and the father), remove the unnecessarily broad disability ground and involve doctors having a role of counsel (rather than gatekeeper).