The effect of a selective CXCR2 antagonist (AZD5069) on human blood neutrophil count and innate immune functions.

Abstract AIMS: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether selective antagonism of the cysteine-X-cysteine chemokine receptor-2 (CXCR2) receptor has any adverse effects on the key innate effector functions of human neutrophils for defence against microbial pathogens. METHODS: In a double-blind, crossover study, 30 healthy volunteers were randomized to treatment with the CXCR2 antagonist AZD5069 (100 mg) or placebo, twice daily orally for 6 days. The peripheral blood neutrophil count was assessed at baseline, daily during treatment and in response to exercise challenge and subcutaneous injection of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). Neutrophil function was evaluated by phagocytosis of Escherichia coli and by the oxidative burst response to E. coli. RESULTS: AZD5069 treatment reversibly reduced circulating neutrophil count from baseline by a mean [standard deviation (SD)] of -1.67 (0.67) ×10(9) l(-1) vs. 0.19 (0.78) ×10(9) l(-1) for placebo on day 2, returning to baseline by day 7 after the last dose. Despite low counts on day 4, a 10-min exercise challenge increased absolute blood neutrophil count, but the effect with AZD5069 was smaller and not sustained, compared with placebo treatment. Subcutaneous G-CSF on day 5 caused a substantial increase in blood neutrophil count in both placebo- and AZD5069-treated subjects. Superoxide anion production in E. coli-stimulated neutrophils and phagocytosis of E. coli were unaffected by AZD5069 (P = 0.375, P = 0.721, respectively vs. baseline, Day 4). AZD5069 was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: CXCR2 antagonism did not appear adversely to affect the mobilization of neutrophils from bone marrow into the peripheral circulation, phagocytosis or the oxidative burst response to bacterial pathogens. This supports the potential of CXCR2 antagonists as a treatment option for diseases in which neutrophils play a pathological role.

Studies of the role of nf-κb in controlling osteoclast differentiation and bone loss

Increased osteoclast (OC) bone resorption and/or decreased osteoblast (OB) bone formation contribute to bone loss in osteoporosis and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Findings of the basic and translational research presented in this thesis demonstrate a number of mechanisms by which cytokine-induced NF-κB activation controls bone resorption and formation: 1) Tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF) expands pool of OC precursors (OCPs) by promoting their proliferation through stimulation of the expression of macrophage colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) receptor, c-Fms, and switching M-CSF-induced resident (M2) to inflammatory (M1) macrophages with enhanced OC forming potential and increased production of inflammatory factors through induction of NF-κB RelB; 2) Similar to RANKL, TNF sequentially activates transcriptional factors NF-κB p50 and p52 followed by c-Fos and then NFATc1 to induce OC differentiation. However, TNF alone induces very limited OC differentiation. In contrast, it pre-activates OCPs to express cFos which cooperates with interleukin-1 (IL-1) produced by these OCPs in an autocrine mechanism by interacting with bone matrix to mediate the OC terminal differentiation and bone resorption from these pre-activated OCPs. 3) TNF-induced OC formation is independent of RANKL but it also induces NF-κB2 p100 to limit OC formation and bone resorption, and thus p100 deletion accelerates joint destruction and systemic bone loss in TNF-induced RA; 4) TNF receptor associated factor-3 (TRAF3) limits OC differentiation by negatively regulating non-canonical NF-κB activation and RANKL induces TRAF3 ubiquitination and lysosomal degradation to promote OC differentiation. Importantly, a lysosomal inhibitor that inhibits TRAF3 degradation prevents ovariectomy-induced bone loss; 5) RelB and Notch NICD bind RUNX2 to inhibit OB differentiation and RelB:p52 dimer association with NICD inhibit OB differentiation by enhancing the binding of RBPjκ to Hes1. These findings suggest that non-canonical NF- κB signaling could be targets to develop new therapies for RA or osteoporosis. For example 1) Agents that degrade TNF-induced RelB could block M1 macrophage differentiation to inhibit inflammation and joint destruction for the therapy of RA; 2)Agents that prevent p100 processing or TRAF3 degradation could inhibit bone resorption and also stimulate bone formation simultaneously for the therapy of osteoporosis.