In vitro study of the effect of wound dressings on planktonic and biofilms from diabetic foot isolates

The management of wound bioburden has previously been evaluated using various antimicrobial wound dressings on bacterial pathogens isolated from various wounds. In this present study, the antimicrobial effect of silver-impregnated dressings (Acticoat and Silvercel) and honey-impregnated dressing (Medihoney™ Apinate) on both planktonic bacteria and quasi-biofilms by Staphylococcus aureus and Proteus mirabilis were assessed using a 6-well plate and standard agar technique. In the 6-well plate assay, a bacterial suspension of 108 colony forming unit (CFU)/mL was inoculated on each dressing in excess Luria-Bertani broth and incubated at 35 – 37°C for 30 and 60 minutes and 24 hours. After each incubation time, bacteria were recovered in sodium thioglycolate solution (STS) and the CFU/mL determined on LB agar. Dressings were cut into circular shapes (2cm diameter and placed on Mueller Hinton agar plates pre-inoculated with bacterial suspensions to determine their zones of inhibition (ZOI) after 24 hours incubation. None of the dressings was effective to significantly inhibit bacterial growth or biofilm formation at all the times tested. Acticoat and Medihoney™ Apinate produced ZOIs between 1.5 – 15 mm against both Staphylococcus aureus and Proteus mirabilis. It is possible that, dressings augmented with antibiotics can significantly reduce quasi-biofilms on standard agar.

Cinnamaldehyde increases the susceptibility of quorum-sensing-mediated biofilms to conventional antibiotics

The role of bacterial communication, also known as quorum sensing is an important mechanism in biofilm formation which is fundamental to the development of anti-biofilm strategies. In this current study, the synergy between a quorum sensing inhibitor (cinnamaldehyde) and two antibiotics (ceftazidime and levofloxacin) was evaluated in an attempt to develop a strategy for biofilm disruption using the high-throughput minimum biofilm eliminating concentration (MBEC) assay. Klebsiella pneumoniae and Proteus mirabilis biofilms of initial broth suspensions of 108 colony forming units (CFU) per mL, cultivated on the pegs of the MBEC device were challenged with 5120 µg/ml of ceftazidime and levofloxacin in a double dilution assay in the presence of 500 µM cinnamaldehyde. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) in the presence of cinnamaldehyde for ceftazidime and levofloxacin were 0.125% (640 µg/mL) and 0.0625% (320 µg/mL) respectively with no significant bacterial growth on LB agar. The MBECs for ceftazidime and levofloxacin were above 5120 and 2560 µg/mL respectively which yielded over 70% reduction in both Klebsiella pneumoniae and Proteus mirabilis biofilms. The above results indicate the possibility that the synergy between antimicrobial agents may lead to biofilm eradication.

The in vitro assessment of the synergistic effects of antibiotics and wound dressings on biofilms from diabetic foot pathogens

The impact of biofilm in the effective control of wound microbiome is an ongoing dilemma which has seen the use of different treatment strategies. The effects of wound dressings and antibiotics on both planktonic bacteria and biofilms have been separately evaluated in previous studies. In this current study, the combined antimicrobial effects of some selected wound dressings (silver-impregnated: Acticoat and Silvercel; and honey-impregnated: Medihoney™ Apinate) and antibiotics (ceftazdime and levofloxacin) on Klebsiella pneumoniae and Proteus mirabilis in their quasi-biofilm state were assessed using zone of inhibition (ZOI) test. Before the addition of the wound dressings, bacterial suspension of 108 colony forming units per mL and different concentrations of ceftazidime and levofloxacin (256, 512, 1024 and 5120µg/mL) of a final volume of 1mL were inoculated on Mueller Hinton agar and allowed to dry. Wound dressings cut into circular shapes (2cm diameter) were aseptically placed on the agar plates and incubated at 35 – 37°C for 24 hours. ZOIs associated with Acticoat, Silvercel and Medihoney™ Apinate dressings were compared with that of Atrauman (non-medicated control) dressing. All three dressings showed significant (p < 0.05) biofilm-inhibiting activity against both bacteria at antibiotic concentrations of 1024 and 5120µg/mL with ZOI between 17.5 and 35mm.

In Vitro Assessment of the Synergy between Polymyxin B (PMB) and Polymyxin B Nonapeptide (PMBN) and Antibiotics on Biofilms from Diabetic Foot Infections

Background: The increasing resistance of Gram-negative bacteria isolated from nosocomial infections and chronic wounds, such as diabetic foot ulcers has renewed research interests in the use of polymyxins in the treatment of multidrug resistant infections. The added resistance conferred by biofilm development in such infections and the absence of novel antibiotics presuppose that polymyxins are the likely drugs of choice in spite of their nephrotoxicity. The effects of PMB and PMBN have been previously assessed on planktonic bacteria isolated from various infections. Methods: This current study assessed the synergy between a PMB/PMBN and two antibiotics (ceftazidime and levofloxacin) in an attempt to develop a strategy for biofilm disruption using the Minimum Biofilm Eradication Concentration Physiology and Genetic assay (MBEC™ P & G, Innovotech Inc, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) and Proteus mirabilis (P. mirabilis) biofilms of initial broth suspensions of 108 colony forming units per mL, cultivated on the pegs of the MBEC device were challenged with 5120 µg/mL of both ceftazidime and levofloxacin in a ten-fold dilution assay and in the presence of 100 and 500 µg/mL PMB and PMBN. Results: From table of results (Table 1), it can be deduced that both ceftazidime and levofloxacin are very effective in inhibiting biofilm development (as shown by percentage inhibition (PI)) when augmented with PMB and PMBN. This is about 100-fold increase in efficacy when compared to the antibiotics used on their own. The percentage reduction (PR) in biofilm was also increased considerably when PMB and PMBN concentrations were increased to 500 µg/mL. PMB was more effective than its less antibacterial derivative PMBN. Levofloxacin was also found to be more effective than ceftazidime when combined with both PMB and PMBN due to its enhanced cell-membrane permeability and as an anti-DNA replication uncoupling agent. Conclusion: The above results indicate that the synergy between antibiotics and cell membrane permeabilising agents may provide alternate strategies towards biofilm eradication