Studies of the role of nf-κb in controlling osteoclast differentiation and bone loss

Increased osteoclast (OC) bone resorption and/or decreased osteoblast (OB) bone formation contribute to bone loss in osteoporosis and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Findings of the basic and translational research presented in this thesis demonstrate a number of mechanisms by which cytokine-induced NF-κB activation controls bone resorption and formation: 1) Tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF) expands pool of OC precursors (OCPs) by promoting their proliferation through stimulation of the expression of macrophage colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) receptor, c-Fms, and switching M-CSF-induced resident (M2) to inflammatory (M1) macrophages with enhanced OC forming potential and increased production of inflammatory factors through induction of NF-κB RelB; 2) Similar to RANKL, TNF sequentially activates transcriptional factors NF-κB p50 and p52 followed by c-Fos and then NFATc1 to induce OC differentiation. However, TNF alone induces very limited OC differentiation. In contrast, it pre-activates OCPs to express cFos which cooperates with interleukin-1 (IL-1) produced by these OCPs in an autocrine mechanism by interacting with bone matrix to mediate the OC terminal differentiation and bone resorption from these pre-activated OCPs. 3) TNF-induced OC formation is independent of RANKL but it also induces NF-κB2 p100 to limit OC formation and bone resorption, and thus p100 deletion accelerates joint destruction and systemic bone loss in TNF-induced RA; 4) TNF receptor associated factor-3 (TRAF3) limits OC differentiation by negatively regulating non-canonical NF-κB activation and RANKL induces TRAF3 ubiquitination and lysosomal degradation to promote OC differentiation. Importantly, a lysosomal inhibitor that inhibits TRAF3 degradation prevents ovariectomy-induced bone loss; 5) RelB and Notch NICD bind RUNX2 to inhibit OB differentiation and RelB:p52 dimer association with NICD inhibit OB differentiation by enhancing the binding of RBPjκ to Hes1. These findings suggest that non-canonical NF- κB signaling could be targets to develop new therapies for RA or osteoporosis. For example 1) Agents that degrade TNF-induced RelB could block M1 macrophage differentiation to inhibit inflammation and joint destruction for the therapy of RA; 2)Agents that prevent p100 processing or TRAF3 degradation could inhibit bone resorption and also stimulate bone formation simultaneously for the therapy of osteoporosis.

Repressive desublimation and the great refusal in Bret Easton Ellis's fiction

In 1968, Herbert Marcuse believed that a Great Refusal was possible, one that would deny the exploitative power of corporate capitalism. Marcuse's vision was never realised. This essay argues that society today is in an advanced state of that which the Frankfurt School termed repressive desublimation and questions whether a liberationary praxis is still possible. It claims that Bret Easton Ellis's fiction choreographs an internalising of the forms of critique that marked 1968 and about which Marcuse writes. It is Ellis's act of double voicing that allows him to develop a duplicitous recalcitrant voice within the state of assimilation and it is double voicing which emerges as the key technique in Ellis's work that effects an ongoing critique in commodity society. Looking at Slavoj iek's recent revisionism of the notion of repressive desublimation, which connects Marxism and psychoanalysis, the essay considers how Ellis's novels, American Psycho, Glamorama and Lunar Park, function to address and reconfigure the relationship between the status of the Marxist fetishised object and the psychoanalytic phobic object in the present-day era of late capitalism. This essay seeks to illuminate how Ellis's fiction, through an involution of Marcuse's political theories, enacts a contemporary refusal from within the state of reification.

In Vitro Assessment of the Synergy between Polymyxin B (PMB) and Polymyxin B Nonapeptide (PMBN) and Antibiotics on Biofilms from Diabetic Foot Infections

Background: The increasing resistance of Gram-negative bacteria isolated from nosocomial infections and chronic wounds, such as diabetic foot ulcers has renewed research interests in the use of polymyxins in the treatment of multidrug resistant infections. The added resistance conferred by biofilm development in such infections and the absence of novel antibiotics presuppose that polymyxins are the likely drugs of choice in spite of their nephrotoxicity. The effects of PMB and PMBN have been previously assessed on planktonic bacteria isolated from various infections. Methods: This current study assessed the synergy between a PMB/PMBN and two antibiotics (ceftazidime and levofloxacin) in an attempt to develop a strategy for biofilm disruption using the Minimum Biofilm Eradication Concentration Physiology and Genetic assay (MBEC™ P & G, Innovotech Inc, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) and Proteus mirabilis (P. mirabilis) biofilms of initial broth suspensions of 108 colony forming units per mL, cultivated on the pegs of the MBEC device were challenged with 5120 µg/mL of both ceftazidime and levofloxacin in a ten-fold dilution assay and in the presence of 100 and 500 µg/mL PMB and PMBN. Results: From table of results (Table 1), it can be deduced that both ceftazidime and levofloxacin are very effective in inhibiting biofilm development (as shown by percentage inhibition (PI)) when augmented with PMB and PMBN. This is about 100-fold increase in efficacy when compared to the antibiotics used on their own. The percentage reduction (PR) in biofilm was also increased considerably when PMB and PMBN concentrations were increased to 500 µg/mL. PMB was more effective than its less antibacterial derivative PMBN. Levofloxacin was also found to be more effective than ceftazidime when combined with both PMB and PMBN due to its enhanced cell-membrane permeability and as an anti-DNA replication uncoupling agent. Conclusion: The above results indicate that the synergy between antibiotics and cell membrane permeabilising agents may provide alternate strategies towards biofilm eradication