1 resultado para Mother and infant - Psychological aspects
em WestminsterResearch - UK
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Aquatic Commons (11)
- ARCA - Repositório Institucional da FIOCRUZ (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (13)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (8)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (10)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (24)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (65)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (46)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (6)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (4)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (6)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (14)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (6)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (259)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (5)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (6)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (11)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (3)
- Duke University (8)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Glasgow Theses Service (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Harvard University (11)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (12)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (14)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (2)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (3)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (65)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (112)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (3)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (37)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (3)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (15)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (5)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (5)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (4)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (5)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (4)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (16)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (25)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (20)
- University of Washington (4)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
As medical technology has advanced, so too have our attitudes towards the level of control we can or should expect to have over our procreative capacities. This creates a multidimensional problem for the law and family planning services in terms of access to services – whether to avoid conception or terminate a pregnancy – and the negligent provision of these services. These developments go to the heart of our perception of autonomy. Unsurprisingly, these matters also raise a moral dilemma for the law. Distinctively, discourse in this area is dominated by assertions of subjective moral value; in relation to life, to personal choice and to notions of the archetypal family. Against this, I stress that a model of objective morality can answer these challenging questions and resolve the inherent problems of legal regulation. Therefore, I argue that notions of autonomy must be based on a rational, action-based understanding of what it means to be a ‘moral agent’. I claim that from this we might support a legal standard, based on objective rational morality, which can frame our constitutional norms and our conception of justice in these contentious areas. This paper claims that the current regulation of abortion is outdated and requires radical reform. It proposes a scheme that would shift the choice towards the mother (and the father), remove the unnecessarily broad disability ground and involve doctors having a role of counsel (rather than gatekeeper).