1 resultado para Horse shows
em WestminsterResearch - UK
Filtro por publicador
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- Archive of European Integration (10)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (11)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (7)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (7)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (73)
- Brock University, Canada (8)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (25)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (2)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (9)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (23)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (2)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (9)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Harvard University (8)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (3)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (11)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (1)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (1)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (6)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (6)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (35)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (421)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (49)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Michigan (168)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (16)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- University of Washington (1)
- USA Library of Congress (3)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
This article reconsiders the House of Lords decision in Rees v. Darlington Memorial Hospital NHS Trust (2003) and the decision to award a conventional award of £15,000 in all cases of failed sterilisation resulting in the birth of an unwanted child. In so doing, it briefly recites the history of the Wrongful Conception action and the unique facts of Rees. It then goes on the consider the implications of two fundamental aspects of the judgment. Firstly, it looks at the 'conventional award' itself and considers the reasoning behind the award and the effect that it has on our understanding of (particularly women's) reproductive autonomy. Secondly, it analyses the rather 'unique' judgment of Lord Scott and his decision to evaluate these cases using the possessory analogy of an unwanted foal; particular focus is given to the notion of parental 'choice' in these cases and whether mitigation (i.e. abortion or adoption) can ever be considered "reasonable".