1 resultado para random effects
em Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK
Filtro por publicador
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (20)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (13)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (15)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (3)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (127)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (4)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (4)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (26)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (17)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (19)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (14)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (12)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (6)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Glasgow Theses Service (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (3)
- Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (2)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (9)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (5)
- Nottingham eTheses (4)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (79)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (115)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (7)
- Repositorio Institucional da UFLA (RIUFLA) (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (189)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (3)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (10)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (9)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (7)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (4)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (4)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (9)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (30)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Background Individual placement and support (IPS) is effective in helping patients return to work but is poorly implemented because of clinical ambivalence and fears of relapse. Aims To assess whether a motivational intervention (motivational interviewing) directed at clinical staff to address ambivalence about employment improved patients’ occupational outcomes. Method Two of four early intervention teams that already provided IPS were randomised to receive motivational interviewing training for clinicians, focused on attitudinal barriers to employment. The trial was registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Register (ISRCTN71943786). Results Of 300 eligible participants, 159 consented to the research. Occupational outcomes were obtained for 134 patients (85%) at 12-month follow-up. More patients in the intervention teams than in the IPS-only teams achieved employment by 12 months (29/68 v. 12/66). A random effects logistic regression accounting for clustering by care coordinator, and adjusted for participants’ gender, ethnicity, educational and employment history and clinical status scores, confirmed superiority of the intervention (odds ratio = 4.3, 95% CI 1.5-16.6). Conclusions Employment outcomes were enhanced by addressing clinicians’ ambivalence about their patients returning to work.