3 resultados para genetic risk
em Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK
Resumo:
OBJECTIVE: To test common genetic variants for association with seasonality (seasonal changes in mood and behavior) and to investigate whether there are shared genetic risk factors between psychiatric disorders and seasonality. METHOD: Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) were conducted in Australian (between 1988 and 1990 and between 2010 and 2013) and Amish (between May 2010 and December 2011) samples in whom the Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire (SPAQ) had been administered, and the results were meta-analyzed in a total sample of 4,156 individuals. Genetic risk scores based on results from prior large GWAS studies of bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD), and schizophrenia were calculated to test for overlap in risk between psychiatric disorders and seasonality. RESULTS: The most significant association was with rs11825064 (P = 1.7 × 10⁻⁶, β = 0.64, standard error = 0.13), an intergenic single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) found on chromosome 11. The evidence for overlap in risk factors was strongest for schizophrenia and seasonality, with the schizophrenia genetic profile scores explaining 3% of the variance in log-transformed global seasonality scores. Bipolar disorder genetic profile scores were also associated with seasonality, although at much weaker levels (minimum P value = 3.4 × 10⁻³), and no evidence for overlap in risk was detected between MDD and seasonality. CONCLUSIONS: Common SNPs of large effect most likely do not exist for seasonality in the populations examined. As expected, there were overlapping genetic risk factors for bipolar disorder (but not MDD) with seasonality. Unexpectedly, the risk for schizophrenia and seasonality had the largest overlap, an unprecedented finding that requires replication in other populations and has potential clinical implications considering overlapping cognitive deficits in seasonal affective disorders and schizophrenia.
Resumo:
Lithium is the mainstay prophylactic treatment for bipolar disorder (BD), but treatment response varies considerably across individuals. Patients who respond well to lithium treatment might represent a relatively homogeneous subtype of this genetically and phenotypically diverse disorder. Here, we performed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to identify (i) specific genetic variations influencing lithium response and (ii) genetic variants associated with risk for lithium-responsive BD. Patients with BD and controls were recruited from Sweden and the United Kingdom. GWAS were performed on 2698 patients with subjectively defined (self-reported) lithium response and 1176 patients with objectively defined (clinically documented) lithium response. We next conducted GWAS comparing lithium responders with healthy controls (1639 subjective responders and 8899 controls; 323 objective responders and 6684 controls). Meta-analyses of Swedish and UK results revealed no significant associations with lithium response within the bipolar subjects. However, when comparing lithium-responsive patients with controls, two imputed markers attained genome-wide significant associations, among which one was validated in confirmatory genotyping (rs116323614, P=2.74 × 10-8). It is an intronic single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) on chromosome 2q31.2 in the gene SEC14 and spectrin domains 1 (SESTD1), which encodes a protein involved in regulation of phospholipids. Phospholipids have been strongly implicated as lithium treatment targets. Furthermore, we estimated the proportion of variance for lithium-responsive BD explained by common variants ('SNP heritability') as 0.25 and 0.29 using two definitions of lithium response. Our results revealed a genetic variant in SESTD1 associated with risk for lithium-responsive BD, suggesting that the understanding of BD etiology could be furthered by focusing on this subtype of BD.
Resumo:
Background and Aims: Women with bipolar disorder are vulnerable to episodes postpartum, but risk factors are poorly understood. We are exploring risk factors for postpartum mood episodes in women with bipolar disorder using a prospective longitudinal design. Methods: Pregnant women with lifetime DSM-IV bipolar disorder are being recruited into the Bipolar Disorder Research Network (www.BDRN.org). Baseline assessments during late pregnancy include lifetime psychopathology and potential risk factors for perinatal episodes such as medication use, sleep, obstetric factors, and psychosocial factors. Blood samples are taken for genetic analysis. Perinatal psychopathology is assessed via follow-up interview at 12-weeks postpartum. Interview data are supplemented by clinician questionnaires and case-note review. Potential risk factors will be compared between women who experience perinatal episodes and those who remain well. Results: 80 participants have been recruited to date. 32/61 (52%) women had a perinatal recurrence by follow-up. 16 (26%) had onset in pregnancy. 21 (34%) had postpartum onset, 19 (90%) within 6-weeks of delivery: 11 (18%) postpartum psychosis, 5 (8%) postpartum hypomania, 5 (8%) postpartum depression. Postpartum relapse was more frequent in women with bipolar-I than bipolar-II disorder (45% vs 17%). 62% women with postpartum relapse took prophylactic medication peripartum and almost all received care from secondary psychiatric services (95%). Conclusions: Rate of postpartum relapse is high, despite most women receiving specialist care and medication perinatally. A larger sample size will allow us to examine potential risk factors for postpartum episodes, which will assist in providing accurate and personalised advice to women with bipolar disorder who are considering pregnancy.