1 resultado para cost-utility analysis
em Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Aquatic Commons (12)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archive of European Integration (12)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (4)
- Aston University Research Archive (20)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (4)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (5)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (34)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (29)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (7)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (9)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (9)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (2)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (6)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ Center for the Blue Economy - Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (6)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (20)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (8)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (4)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (6)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (8)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (2)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (22)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (4)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (3)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (53)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (231)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (3)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (5)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (36)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT - Medelin - Colombia (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (4)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- Scielo España (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (20)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (18)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (14)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Michigan (36)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (30)
- University of Washington (11)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Background The HCL-32 is a widely-used screening questionnaire for hypomania. We aimed to use a Rasch analysis approach to (i) evaluate the measurement properties, principally unidimensionality, of the HCL-32, and (ii) generate a score table to allow researchers to convert raw HCL-32 scores into an interval-level measurement which will be more appropriate for statistical analyses. Methods Subjects were part of the Bipolar Disorder Research Network (BDRN) study with DSM-IV bipolar disorder (n=389). Multidimensionality was assessed using the Rasch fit statistics and principle components analysis of the residuals (PCA). Item invariance (differential item functioning, DIF) was tested for gender, bipolar diagnosis and current mental state. Item estimates and reliabilities were calculated. Results Three items (29, 30, 32) had unacceptable fit to the Rasch unidimensional model. Item 14 displayed significant DIF for gender and items 8 and 17 for current mental state. Item estimates confirmed that not all items measure hypomania equally. Limitations This sample was recruited as part of a large ongoing genetic epidemiology study of bipolar disorder and may not be fully representative of the broader clinical population of individuals with bipolar disorder. Conclusion The HCL-32 is unidimensional in practice, but measurements may be further strengthened by the removal of four items. Re-scored linear measurements may be more appropriate for clinical research.