1 resultado para Synthetic apertures
em Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK
Filtro por publicador
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (3)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (13)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Aquatic Commons (5)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (3)
- Archive of European Integration (14)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (6)
- Aston University Research Archive (52)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (14)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (14)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (53)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (15)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (24)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (45)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (34)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (5)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (4)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (7)
- Digital Knowledge Repository of Central Drug Research Institute (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (9)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (3)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (10)
- Glasgow Theses Service (4)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (4)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (100)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (3)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (1)
- Laboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia - Portugal (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memorial University Research Repository (2)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (30)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (7)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (72)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (79)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (2)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (4)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (77)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (2)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (9)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (1)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (45)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (45)
- University of Washington (4)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
A survey of primary schools in England found that girls outperform boys in English across all phases (Ofsted in Moving English forward. Ofsted, Manchester, 2012). The gender gap remains an on-going issue in England, especially for reading attainment. This paper presents evidence of gender differences in learning to read that emerged during the development of a reading scheme for 4- and 5-year-old children in which 372 children from Reception classes in sixteen schools participated in 12-month trials. There were three arms per trial: Intervention non-PD (non-phonically decodable text with mixed methods teaching); Intervention PD (phonically decodable text with mixed methods teaching); and a ‘business as usual’ control condition SP (synthetic phonics and decodable text). Assignment to Intervention condition was randomised. Standardised measures of word reading and comprehension were used. The research provides statistically significant evidence suggesting that boys learn more easily using a mix of whole-word and synthetic phonics approaches. In addition, the evidence indicates that boys learn to read more easily using the natural-style language of ‘real’ books including vocabulary which goes beyond their assumed decoding ability. At post-test, boys using the nonphonically decodable text with mixed methods (Intervention A) were 8 months ahead in reading comprehension compared to boys using a wholly synthetic phonics approach.