1 resultado para Remote voting
em Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (4)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (5)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (4)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (8)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (6)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (4)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (2)
- Archive of European Integration (24)
- Aston University Research Archive (29)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (8)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (53)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (61)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (7)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (75)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (3)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (7)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (29)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (2)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (11)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (8)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (20)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (1)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (2)
- Harvard University (8)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (28)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (15)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Aerospace Laboratory (NLR) Reports Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (6)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (37)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (5)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (3)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (2)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (22)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (18)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (13)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (3)
- Universidad de Alicante (6)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (32)
- Universidade de Madeira (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (43)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (3)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Michigan (72)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (141)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (3)
- University of Washington (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
I wanted to explore whether traditional Forum Theatre approaches can be enhanced by the use of integrated voting software to empower young people. My research is based on two of a series of widening participation interactive TiE programmes focused on the decisions young people make on educational progression. I worked as a director alongside students studying Drama and Performance at The University of Worcester and the programmes have toured widely to schools across Worcestershire and Herefordshire. ‘It’s Up to You!’ (2013 – 2014) was aimed at years 8 and 9 choosing their GCSE options and ‘Move on Up!’ (2014 - 2015) looked at the hopes and fears of year 6 pupils about to go up to secondary school. Finding a voice in Boal’s framework as a ‘specactor’ does not always appeal to a pupil who does not want to stand out from the crowd or is not familiar with a classroom where drama conventions are practised or understood. The anonymity of the voting software with results of decisions made appearing instantly on screen is certainly appealing to some pupils: ‘I also loved the keypads they gave us so that we could answer the questions without having to put our hand up and wait..’ This paper aims to interrogate the idea that empowering needs to not simply be about giving voice to a few confident group members but allowing the silent majority to be able to experiment with decision making in an educational and social context.