1 resultado para Prescott, William--1765-1844
em Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (8)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (3)
- Aquatic Commons (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (6)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (2)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (1)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (1)
- Boston University Digital Common (14)
- Brock University, Canada (180)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Cámara de Comercio de Bogotá, Colombia (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (43)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (27)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (10)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (28)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (3)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (114)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (6)
- Harvard University (21)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (4)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (8)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (67)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (8)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (31)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (88)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (27)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (20)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (8)
- University of Michigan (173)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Twenty years since its release onto the big screen, Baz Luhrmann’s William Shakespeare’s Romeo+Juliet continues to attract viewers, divide critics and remain unchallenged, in a league of its own, when it comes to film adaptation of Shakespeare’s plays. This article begins with taking stock of reception directions which still dispute the field of film adaptation. Cued by Worthen’s “Performance Paradigm”, my argument positions Luhrmann’s film (his second at the time and the one to propel the Australian director into Hollywood fame) firmly in the cinematic and sees the film narrative not as opposed to the textual and/or spoken one, but as a complex citational practice developed at the level of oral, visual and written discourse.