1 resultado para Factor of risk
em Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK
Filtro por publicador
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (3)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (5)
- Aston University Research Archive (38)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (14)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (75)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (1)
- Bioline International (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (60)
- Brock University, Canada (8)
- Brunel University (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (44)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (6)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (3)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (6)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (16)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (4)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (10)
- CUNY Academic Works (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (14)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (29)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (13)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (3)
- Duke University (4)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (3)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (3)
- Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (4)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (16)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (2)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (16)
- Nottingham eTheses (4)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (26)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (3)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (23)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (6)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (4)
- Repositório Digital da Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional dos Hospitais da Universidade Coimbra (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (52)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (20)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (2)
- Scielo España (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (73)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (5)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (12)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (3)
- Universidade do Minho (9)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (70)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (9)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (12)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (69)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
This paper reviews the literature of construction risk modelling and assessment. It also reviews the real practice of risk assessment. The review resulted in significant results, summarised as follows. There has been a major shift in risk perception from an estimation variance into a project attribute. Although the Probability–Impact risk model is prevailing, substantial efforts are being put to improving it reflecting the increasing complexity of construction projects. The literature lacks a comprehensive assessment approach capable of capturing risk impact on different project objectives. Obtaining a realistic project risk level demands an effective mechanism for aggregating individual risk assessments. The various assessment tools suffer from low take-up; professionals typically rely on their experience. It is concluded that a simple analytical tool that uses risk cost as a common scale and utilises professional experience could be a viable option to facilitate closing the gap between theory and practice of risk assessment.