1 resultado para Environmental risk assessment
em Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (4)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (3)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (13)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- Aquatic Commons (13)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (14)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (20)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (3)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (3)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (47)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (12)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (52)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (16)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (6)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (7)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (123)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (2)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (7)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (8)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (10)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (3)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (3)
- Duke University (8)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (17)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (15)
- Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (2)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (2)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (11)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (11)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (2)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (3)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (11)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (4)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (74)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (127)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (7)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- REPOSITORIO DIGITAL IMARPE - INSTITUTO DEL MAR DEL PERÚ, Peru (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (17)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (57)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (7)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (9)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (11)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (5)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (11)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (8)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (4)
- University of Michigan (43)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (49)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (3)
- University of Washington (6)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
This paper reviews the literature of construction risk modelling and assessment. It also reviews the real practice of risk assessment. The review resulted in significant results, summarised as follows. There has been a major shift in risk perception from an estimation variance into a project attribute. Although the Probability–Impact risk model is prevailing, substantial efforts are being put to improving it reflecting the increasing complexity of construction projects. The literature lacks a comprehensive assessment approach capable of capturing risk impact on different project objectives. Obtaining a realistic project risk level demands an effective mechanism for aggregating individual risk assessments. The various assessment tools suffer from low take-up; professionals typically rely on their experience. It is concluded that a simple analytical tool that uses risk cost as a common scale and utilises professional experience could be a viable option to facilitate closing the gap between theory and practice of risk assessment.