A three-stage DEA model to evaluate learning-teaching technical efficiency: Key performance indicators and contextual variables

This study evaluates the technical efficiency of the learning-teaching process in higher education using a three-stage procedure that offers advances in comparison to previous studies and improves the quality of the results. First, it utilizes a multiple stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) with contextual variables. Second, the levels of super efficiency are calculated in order to prioritize the efficiency units. And finally, through sensitivity analysis, the contribution of each key performance indicator (KPI) is established with respect to the efficiency levels without omission of variables. The analytical data was collected from a survey completed by 633 tourism students during the 2011/12, 2012/13 and 2013/14 academic course years. The results suggest that level of satisfaction with the course, diversity of materials and satisfaction with the teacher were the most important factors affecting teaching performance. Furthermore, the effect of the contextual variables was found to be significant.

Carbon nanotube-supported Ni–CeO2 catalysts. Effect of the support on the catalytic performance in the low-temperature WGS reaction

The low temperature water-gas shift (WGS) reaction has been studied over two commercial multiwall carbon nanotubes-supported nickel catalysts promoted by ceria. For comparison purposes, activated carbon-supported catalysts have also been studied. The catalytic performance and the characterization by N2 adsorption analysis, powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), temperature-programmed reduction with H2 (TPR-H2), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis showed that the surface chemistry has an important effect on the dispersion of ceria. As a result, ceria was successfully dispersed over the carbon nanotubes (CNTs) with less graphitic character, and the catalyst afforded better activity in WGS than the catalyst prepared over massive ceria. Moreover, a 20 wt.% CeO2 loading over this support was more active than the analogous catalyst with a 40 wt.% loading. The ceria nanoparticles were smaller when the support was previously oxidized, however this resulted in a decrease of the activity.