1 resultado para open scholarship
em Universidad de Alicante
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (15)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Aquatic Commons (12)
- Archive of European Integration (11)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- Boston University Digital Common (5)
- Brock University, Canada (9)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (85)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (91)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (4)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (41)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (18)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- Duke University (9)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (4)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (21)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (26)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (84)
- Infoteca EMBRAPA (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (6)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (11)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (21)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (131)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (237)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP (1)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (5)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (3)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (2)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (4)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (18)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (7)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (12)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (54)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
The development of the Web 2.0 led to the birth of new textual genres such as blogs, reviews or forum entries. The increasing number of such texts and the highly diverse topics they discuss make blogs a rich source for analysis. This paper presents a comparative study on open domain and opinion QA systems. A collection of opinion and mixed fact-opinion questions in English is defined and two Question Answering systems are employed to retrieve the answers to these queries. The first one is generic, while the second is specific for emotions. We comparatively evaluate and analyze the systems’ results, concluding that opinion Question Answering requires the use of specific resources and methods.