Differences in exposure to occupational health risks in Spanish and foreign-born workers in Spain (Itsal Project)

Migrant workers usually show higher rates of work-related health problems than natives. However, little information is available about their exposure to occupational risks. We describe self-reported working exposure in Spanish and foreign-born workers. A cross-sectional survey was conducted as part of the ITSAL Project. Data on sociodemographic and self-reported occupational exposure in 1,841 foreign-born and 509 Spanish workers were collected through face-to-face interviews. Prevalence and adjusted odds ratios-aOR- (by age, education, type of contract) were calculated. Foreign-born men in non-services sectors and those in manual occupations perceived exposure to occupational risks with lower prevalence than Spanish workers. Foreign-born women reported higher prevalence of exposure than Spanish female workers. By occupation, foreign-born female workers were more likely than Spanish workers to report working many hours/day (aOR2.68; 95 % CI 1.06–6.78) and exposure to extreme temperatures (aOR2.19; 95 % CI 1.10–4.38). Some groups of migrant workers may need increased protection regarding some occupational exposures.

Factores asociados a la predisposición a vacunarse contra la gripe pandémica A/H1N1 en población adulta del Departamento de Salud de Elche (España): influencia de las fuentes de información

Fundamento. Evaluar en población general las fuentes de información, actitudes y predisposición hacia la vacunación contra la gripe pandémica A/H1N1 de 2009. Métodos. Estudio descriptivo de carácter transversal realizado entre el 25 de noviembre y 30 de diciembre de 2009 mediante entrevista personal cara a cara a una muestra aleatoria (826) de adultos residentes en el Departamento de Salud de Elche (España). Resultados. Los encuestados manifestaron que la televisión (57%) y el médico de familia (47,9%) eran su fuente principal de información sobre vacunas. El 82,2% tenía una buena opinión sobre las vacunas, un 30,5% percibía la gripe A/H1N1 como más grave que la estacional, siendo esta percepción creciente entre los de mayor edad y con menos estudios. Un 25,4% de encuestados sentía preocupación por padecerla, sobre todo los de menor nivel educativo. Un 42,1% manifiesta su buena predisposición para vacunarse contra la gripe estacional, disminuyendo hasta un 18,4% la intención hacia la gripe A/H1N1. La predisposición hacia la vacunación crece con la edad y en el caso de la gripe A/H1N1 decrece a mayor nivel educativo. El médico de familia es la fuente de información más determinante para inmunizarse frente a gripe estacional (OR 1,43) y gripe A/H1N1 (OR 2,47). Conclusiones. Existe baja aceptabilidad de la vacuna pandémica y baja percepción de gravedad sobre la gripe A/H1N1. La experiencia previa de vacunación ante gripe estacional predispone hacia la inmunización contra gripe A/H1N1. Aunque los medios de comunicación encabezan la fuente de información más usual durante este episodio, la influencia del médico de familia en la decisión de vacunarse resulta significativa.

Acceptability of pandemic A(H1N1) influenza vaccination by Essential Community Workers in 2010 Alicante (Spain), perceived seriousness and sources of information

Objective. Describe acceptability of pandemic A(H1N1) influenza vaccination by Essential Community Workers (ECWs) from Alicante province (Spain) in January 2010. Evaluate the correlation with attitudes, beliefs, professional advice and information broadcasted by media. Method. In this cross-sectional study, face-to-face interviews were conducted with 742 ECWs to assess their attitudes towards vaccination against the pandemic influenza strain. A multivariable regression model was made to adjust the Odds Ratios (ORs). Results. Some ECWs reported having been vaccinated with seasonal vaccine, 21.5% (95%IC 18.6–24.9); only 15.4% (95%IC 12.8–18.4) with the pandemic one. ECWs vaccinated regularly against seasonal flu (OR 5.1; 95%IC 2.9–9.1), those who considered pandemic influenza as a severe or more serious disease than seasonal flu (OR 3.8; 95%IC 2.1–6.7) and those who never had doubts about vaccine safety (OR 3.7; 95%IC2.1–6.7) had a better acceptance of pandemic vaccine. Finally, 78.7% (95%IC 75.1–81.4) had doubts about pandemic vaccine's effectiveness. Conclusion. The vast amount of information provided by the media did not seem to be decisive to prevent doubts or to improve the acceptability of the vaccine in ECWs. Professional advice should be the focus of interest in future influenza vaccination campaigns. These results should be taken into account by health authorities.