Visual Manifestations of Primary Metaphors Through Mise-en-scène Techniques

Grady distinguishes two main types of metaphor in order to provide a solution in the controversies stemming from the conceptual theory of metaphor: correlation-based metaphors and resemblance metaphors. In “correlation-based metaphors”, the source domain is sensory-motor, while the target domain is not. On the contrary, “resemblance metaphors” are originated by a physical or conceptual perception which is common in both domains, by the association of concepts with common features. Primary metaphors are the minimal units of correlation-based metaphors; they are inherent in human nature and the result of the nature of our brain, our body and the world that we inhabit. We acquire them automatically and we cannot avoid them. Furthermore, as corporal experiences are universal, so are primary metaphors. In this paper, I will argue that primary metaphors manifest themselves visually through scene-setting techniques such as composition, framing, camera movement or lighting. Film-makers can use the different aspects of mise-en-scène metaphorically in order to express abstract notions like evil, importance, control, relationship or confusion. Such visual manifestations, as also occurs with their verbal equivalents, frequently go unnoticed or have been used so often that they have become clichés. But the important thing to bear in mind is that their origin lies in a primary metaphor and due to this origin these kinds of film-making strategies have been so expressively successful.

La aplicación de las medidas correctivas de control de la estabilidad presupuestaria y sostenibilidad financiera a las subvenciones

A través del presente trabajo se pretende analizar algunas de las medidas correctivas que sobre la Administración pública impone la LOEPSF. En concreto, la contenida en el art. 20.3 de la citada Ley, que obliga a recabar un informe del Ministerio de Hacienda para la percepción de subvenciones públicas a los entes del sector público integrados en Comunidades Autónomas que no hayan cumplido los objetivos de déficit. El trabajo defiende una interpretación restrictiva del citado precepto sobre la base del análisis del presupuesto de hecho de la norma y su naturaleza de norma sancionadora.