Estrategia de relaciones públicas en la comunicación de la epilepsia infanto-juvenil

La epilepsia es una enfermedad desconocida por el público en general, una enfermedad "invisible" para la sociedad, con implicaciones psicosociales, sociales, educativas, laborales y económicas que reducen la calidad de vida de los niñ@s y jóvenes con epilepsia, y la de sus familias. En su página web, la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) y sus asociados reconocen que la epilepsia es un importante problema de salud pública. La OMS, la Liga Internacional contra la Epilepsia y la Oficina Internacional para la Epilepsia están llevando a cabo una campaña mundial para mejorar la información y la sensibilización acerca de la epilepsia y fortalecer las medidas públicas y privadas para mejorar la atención y reducir el impacto de la enfermedad. Estudiar la comunicación de la epilepsia en niños y adolescentes y sus consecuencias entre los agentes que interactúan en su convivencia, es una cuestión necesaria para conocer y entender la dimensión que alcanza esta enfermedad. El trabajo que presentamos persigue introducirnos en las carencias y las limitaciones con las que las familias con hij@s epilépticos se encuentran para informar a la sociedad sobre la patología y adaptar los mensajes que satisfagan las necesidades de cada uno de los públicos afectados. El desarrollo de un grupo de discusión y la aplicación de la encuesta nos permite poner de manifiesto que, la información que se difunde sobre la epilepsia arrastra el todavía irremediable estigma social que atolla actitudes afirmativas en el entorno de la enfermedad infanto-juvenil”. La corroboración de la hipótesis nos lleva a proponer un programa de relaciones públicas cuya estrategia sea la visibilidad y la sensibilización de la enfermedad, como aportación principal del estudio.

Assessment of University External Internships. Towards a Mixed Model for Measuring the Acquisition of Skills and the Satisfaction of Parties Involved

The continuous improvement of management and assessment processes for curricular external internships has led a group of university teachers specialised in this area to develop a mixed model of measurement that combines the verification of skill acquisition by those students choosing external internships with the satisfaction of the parties involved in that process. They included academics, educational tutors of companies and organisations and administration and services personnel in the latter category. The experience, developed within University of Alicante, has been carried out in the degrees of Business Administration and Management, Business Studies, Economics, Advertising and Public Relations, Sociology and Social Work, all part of the Faculty of Economics and Business. By designing and managing closed standardised interviews and other research tools, validated outside the centre, a system of continuous improvement and quality assurance has been created, clearly contributing to the gradual increase in the number of students with internships in this Faculty, as well as to the improvement in satisfaction, efficiency and efficacy indicators at a global level. As this experience of educational innovation has shown, the acquisition of curricular knowledge, skills, abilities and competences by the students is directly correlated with the satisfaction of those parties involved in a process that takes the student beyond the physical borders of a university campus. Ensuring the latter is a task made easier by the implementation of a mixed assessment method, combining continuous and final assessment, and characterised by its rigorousness and simple management. This report presents that model, subject in turn to a persistent and continuous control, a model all parties involved in the external internships are taking part of. Its short-term results imply an increase, estimated at 15% for the last course, in the number of students choosing curricular internships and, for the medium and long-term, a major interweaving between the academic world and its social and productive environment, both in the business and institutional areas. The potentiality of this assessment model does not lie only in the quality of its measurement tools, but also in the effects from its use in the various groups and in the actions that are carried out as a result of its implementation and which, without any doubt and as it is shown below, are the real guarantee of a continuous improvement.

Testing the level of interactivity of institutional websites: From museums 1.0 to museums 2.0

The Internet has changed the way in which organizations communicate with their publics, and museums are not an exception. The consolidation of Web 2.0 has not only given museums access to a powerful new tool for disseminating information, but has involved significant changes in the relationship between institutions and their publics, facilitating and enhancing the interaction between them. The overall objective of this paper is to analyze the degree of interactivity implemented in the websites of major international art museums, in order to assess if museums are evolving towards more dialogic systems with relation to their publics. The results indicate that museums still have a low level of interactivity on their websites, both in the tools used to present information and the resources available for interaction with virtual visitors. But it has also observed that museums are progressively implementing interactive and dialogic sources, suggesting a clear trend towards new ways of managing these platforms in order to establish more participatory and collaborative communication systems with virtual users.