1 resultado para Expert elicitation
em Universidad de Alicante
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (3)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Archive of European Integration (17)
- Aston University Research Archive (37)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca Digital - Universidad Icesi - Colombia (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (39)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (1)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (2)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (44)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (11)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (46)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (5)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (7)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (93)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (17)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (11)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (5)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Düsseldorfer Dokumenten- und Publikationsservice (1)
- E-Research at Tennessee State University (1)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (114)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (2)
- Georgian Library Association, Georgia (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (26)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (24)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (2)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (2)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (5)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Open Access Repository of Indian Theses (1)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (4)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (17)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (17)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (5)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (5)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (10)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- RIBERDIS - Repositorio IBERoamericano sobre DIScapacidad - Centro Español de Documentación sobre Discapacidad (CEDD) (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (37)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (21)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (5)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (13)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade do Minho (16)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (4)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (2)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (120)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (8)
- University of Michigan (18)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (74)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (3)
Resumo:
Femicide, defined as the killings of females by males because they are females, is becoming recognized worldwide as an important ongoing manifestation of gender inequality. Despite its high prevalence or widespread prevalence, only a few countries have specific registries about this issue. This study aims to assemble expert opinion regarding the strategies which might feasibly be employed to promote, develop and implement an integrated and differentiated femicide data collection system in Europe at both the national and international levels. Concept mapping methodology was followed, involving 28 experts from 16 countries in generating strategies, sorting and rating them with respect to relevance and feasibility. The experts involved were all members of the EU-Cost-Action on femicide, which is a scientific network of experts on femicide and violence against women across Europe. As a result, a conceptual map emerged, consisting of 69 strategies organized in 10 clusters, which fit into two domains: “Political action” and “Technical steps”. There was consensus among participants regarding the high relevance of strategies to institutionalize national databases and raise public awareness through different stakeholders, while strategies to promote media involvement were identified as the most feasible. Differences in perceived priorities according to the level of human development index of the experts’ countries were also observed.