Violencia estructural: una ilustración del concepto

El término violencia estructural es aplicable en aquellas situaciones en las que se produce un daño en la satisfacción de las necesidades humanas básicas (supervivencia, bienestar, identidad o libertad) como resultado de los procesos de estratificación social, es decir, sin necesidad de formas de violencia directa. El término violencia estructural remite a la existencia de un conflicto entre dos o más grupos de una sociedad (normalmente caracterizados en términos de género, etnia, clase, nacionalidad, edad u otros) en el que el reparto, acceso o posibilidad de uso de los recursos es resuelto sistemáticamente a favor de alguna de las partes y en perjuicio de las demás, debido a los mecanismos de estratificación social. La utilidad del término violencia estructural radica en el reconocimiento de la existencia de conflicto en el uso de los recursos materiales y sociales y, como tal, es útil para entender y relacionarlo con manifestaciones de violencia directa (cuando alguno de los grupos quiere cambiar o reforzar su posición en la situación conflictiva por la vía de la fuerza) o de violencia cultural (legitimizaciones de las otras dos formas de violencia, como, por ejemplo, el racismo, sexismo, clasismo o eurocentrismo).

Comunicación de masas y violencia estructural

Este trabajo conecta dos dimensiones de la violencia que están presentes en los estudios sobre Investigación para la Paz. A partir de la conocida clasificación de Galtung, en este ensayo abordamos dos tipos de violencia: la estructural (exclusión, desigualdad) y la cultural (o legitimación de la violencia). Del cruce entre tres ámbitos de exclusión comunicativa y los tres modelos que abordan la desigualdad en la comunicación, se obtienen las líneas de investigación que se proponen para el estudio de la desigualdad en el ámbito comunicativo. Es una reflexión teórica que atiende a las diferentes metodologías empleadas en el estudio del fenómeno comunicativo y que pueden ser productivas para el estudio de la desigualdad en el ámbito cultural.

Barriers and facilitators to effective coverage of Intimate Partner Violence services for immigrant women in Spain

Objective: To explore service providers’ perceptions in order to identify barriers and facilitators to effective coverage of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) services for immigrant women in Spain, according to the different categories proposed in Tanahashi's model of effective coverage. Methods: A qualitative study based on 29 in-depth personal interviews and four group interviews with a total of 43 professionals working in public services (social and health-care services, women's refuges, the police force, the judiciary) and NGOs in Barcelona, Madrid, Valencia and Alicante (Spain) in 2011. Findings: Current IPV services in Spain partially fail in their coverage of abused immigrant women due to barriers of (i) availability, such as the inexistence of culturally appropriate services; (ii) accessibility, as having a residence permit is a prerequisite for women's access to different services and rights; (iii) acceptability, such as women's lack of confidence in the effectiveness of services; and (iv) effectiveness, for example, lack of specific training among professionals on the issues of IPV and immigration. However, interviewees also identified facilitators, such as the enabling environment promoted by the Spanish Law on Gender-Based Violence (1/2004), and the impetus it has provided for the development of other specific legislative tools to address IPV in immigrant populations in Spain (availability, accessibility and effectiveness). Conclusion: Whilst not dismissing cultural barriers, aspects related to service structure are identified by providers as the main barriers and facilitators to immigrant women use of IPV services. Despite noteworthy achievements, improvements are still required in terms of mainstreaming assistance tailored to immigrant women's needs in IPV policies and services.

How Does Intimate Partner Violence Differ Depending on Level of Rurality of Residential Area in Spain?

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is recognized as a worldwide public health problem. Most theories ascribe IPV to individual, family, or cultural factors. Authors analyzed different residential areas in Spain in terms of IPV frequency as well as its impact on health and the use of services. A standardized self-administered cross-sectional survey was administered to ever-partnered adult women ages 18 to 70 years receiving care at primary health care centers (N = 10,322). Logistic regression analyzed the association between the level of rurality and health indicators, IPV, and use of services. The lowest frequency of IPV among women is reflected in higher rurality. Women of medium and low rurality presented a poorer self-perceived health and more physical health problems. Women from medium and low rurality areas declared seeking health services more frequently. These results show the importance of the environment in health and indicate the need for research on urban–rural differences in health problems to develop specific public health programs for each country.