1 resultado para Concentric Return Paths
em Universidad de Alicante
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (6)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (3)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (19)
- Aston University Research Archive (34)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (94)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (39)
- Brock University, Canada (19)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (3)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (79)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (2)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (11)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (33)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (2)
- CUNY Academic Works (2)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (2)
- Digital Archives@Colby (5)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (13)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (3)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (3)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (23)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Harvard University (10)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (2)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (8)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (3)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (5)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (5)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (6)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (29)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (5)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (26)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (17)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (8)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (8)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (9)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade do Minho (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (4)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (4)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (40)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (4)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (141)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (96)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (5)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (5)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
It has been widely documented that when Building Information Modelling (BIM) is used, there is a shift in effort to the design phase. Little investigation into the impact of this shift in effort has been done and how it impacts on costs. It can be difficult to justify the increased expenditure on BIM in a market that is heavily driven by costs. There are currently studies attempting to quantify the return on investment (ROI) for BIM for which these returns can be seen to balance out the shift in efforts and costs to the design phase. The studies however quantify the ROI based on the individual stakeholder’s investment without consideration for the impact that the use of BIM from their project partners may have on their own profitability. In this study, a questionnaire investigated opinions and experience of construction professionals, representing clients, consultants, designers and contractors, to determine fluctuations in costs by their magnitude and when they occur. These factors were examined more closely by interviewing senior members representing each of the stakeholder categories and comparing their experience in using BIM within environments where their project partners were also using BIM and when they were not. This determined the differences in how the use and the investment in BIM impacts on others and how costs are redistributed. This redistribution is not just through time but also between stakeholders and categories of costs. Some of these cost fluctuations and how the cost of BIM is currently financed are also highlighted in several case studies. The results show that the current distribution of costs set for traditional 2D delivery is hindering the potential success of BIM. There is also evidence that stakeholders who don’t use BIM may benefit financially from the BIM use of others and that collaborative BIM is significantly different to the use of ‘lonely’ BIM in terms of benefits and profitability.