Removing noisy mentions for distant supervision

Los métodos para Extracción de Información basados en la Supervisión a Distancia se basan en usar tuplas correctas para adquirir menciones de esas tuplas, y así entrenar un sistema tradicional de extracción de información supervisado. En este artículo analizamos las fuentes de ruido en las menciones, y exploramos métodos sencillos para filtrar menciones ruidosas. Los resultados demuestran que combinando el filtrado de tuplas por frecuencia, la información mutua y la eliminación de menciones lejos de los centroides de sus respectivas etiquetas mejora los resultados de dos modelos de extracción de información significativamente.

Is there any evidence for the validity of diagnostic criteria used for accommodative and nonstrabismic binocular dysfunctions?

Purpose: To analyze the diagnostic criteria used in the scientific literature published in the past 25 years for accommodative and nonstrabismic binocular dysfunctions and to explore if the epidemiological analysis of diagnostic validity has been used to propose which clinical criteria should be used for diagnostic purposes. Methods: We carried out a systematic review of papers on accommodative and non-strabic binocular disorders published from 1986 to 2012 analysing the MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and FRANCIS databases. We admitted original articles about diagnosis of these anomalies in any population. We identified 839 articles and 12 studies were included. The quality of included articles was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Results: The review shows a wide range of clinical signs and cut-off points between authors. Only 3 studies (regarding accommodative anomalies) assessed diagnostic accuracy of clinical signs. Their results suggest using the accommodative amplitude and monocular accommodative facility for diagnosing accommodative insufficiency and a high positive relative accommodation for accommodative excess. The remaining 9 articles did not analyze diagnostic accuracy, assessing a diagnosis with the criteria the authors considered. We also found differences between studies in the way of considering patients’ symptomatology. 3 studies of 12 analyzed, performed a validation of a symptom survey used for convergence insufficiency. Conclusions: Scientific literature reveals differences between authors according to diagnostic criteria for accommodative and nonstrabismic binocular dysfunctions. Diagnostic accuracy studies show that there is only certain evidence for accommodative conditions. For binocular anomalies there is only evidence about a validated questionnaire for convergence insufficiency with no data of diagnostic accuracy.

Narrativa digital e infancia. La generación de los creadores colaborativos

La naturaleza de los medios y lenguajes digitales ha posibilitado el desarrollo de diferentes técnicas que, en el canon del mundo analógico, se veían limitadas. Esta combinación ha originado, en los primeros años de vida del ser humano, nuevas formas de aprender envueltas en una nueva realidad. Las técnicas de creación que adquieren los niños en espacios alejados de cualquier currículo escolar, son desarrolladas gracias a su condición de ciudadanos de un contexto de sabios digitales; condición que trae intrínseco un conocimiento en el manejo tecnológico como de manera innata, convirtiendo la narrativa digital en el medio que ellos utilizan para aprender y comunicarse. Como consecuencia, en el modelo EMEREC más individualista se abre paso una generación de creadores colaborativos otorgando, por medio de la participación infantil, una mayor potencialidad a la ley de los tres tercios.

Pore size distributions derived from adsorption isotherms, immersion calorimetry, and isosteric heats: A comparative study

We compare the pore size distribution of a well-characterized activated carbon derived from model-dependent, adsorption integral equation (AIE) methods with those from model-independent, immersion calorimetry and isosteric heat analyses. The AIE approach applied to nitrogen gave a mean pore width of 0.57 nm; the CO2 distribution exhibited wider dispersion. Spherical model application to CO2 and diffusion limitations for nitrogen and argon were proposed as primary reasons for inconsistency. Immersion enthalpy revealed a sharp decrease in available area equivalent to a cut-off due to molecular exclusion when the accessible surface was assessed against probe kinetic diameter. Mean pore width was identified as 0.58 ± 0.02 nm, endorsing the underlying assumptions for the nitrogen-based AIE approach. A comparison of the zero-coverage isosteric heat of adsorption for various non-polar adsorptives by the porous test sample was compared with the same adsorptives in contact with a non-porous reference adsorbent, leading to an energy ratio or adsorption enhancement factor. A linear relationship between the energy ratio and probe kinetic diameter indicated a primary pore size at 0.59 nm. The advantage of this enthalpy, model-independent methods over AIE were due to no assumptions regarding probe molecular shape, and no assumptions for pore shape and/or connectivity.