Clay-supported graphene materials: application to hydrogen storage

The present work refers to clay–graphene nanomaterials prepared by a green way using caramel from sucrose and two types of natural clays (montmorillonite and sepiolite) as precursors, with the aim of evaluating their potential use in hydrogen storage. The impregnation of the clay substrates by caramel in aqueous media, followed by a thermal treatment in the absence of oxygen of these clay–caramel intermediates gives rise to graphene-like materials, which remain strongly bound to the silicate support. The nature of the resulting materials was characterized by different techniques such as XRD, Raman spectroscopy and TEM, as well as by adsorption isotherms of N2, CO2 and H2O. These carbon–clay nanocomposites can act as adsorbents for hydrogen storage, achieving, at 298 K and 20 MPa, over 0.1 wt% of hydrogen adsorption excess related to the total mass of the system, and a maximum value close to 0.4 wt% of hydrogen specifically related to the carbon mass. The very high isosteric heat for hydrogen sorption determined from adsorption isotherms at different temperatures (14.5 kJ mol−1) fits well with the theoretical values available for hydrogen storage on materials that show a strong stabilization of the H2 molecule upon adsorption.

Plastisol foaming process. Decomposition of the foaming agent, polymer behavior in the corresponding temperature range and resulting foam properties

The decomposition of azodicarbonamide, used as foaming agent in PVC—plasticizer (1/1) plastisols was studied by DSC. Nineteen different plasticizers, all belonging to the ester family, two being polymeric (polyadipates), were compared. The temperature of maximum decomposition rate (in anisothermal regime at 5 K min−1 scanning rate), ranges between 434 and 452 K. The heat of decomposition ranges between 8.7 and 12.5 J g−1. Some trends of variation of these parameters appear significant and are discussed in terms of solvent (matrix) and viscosity effects on the decomposition reactions. The shear modulus at 1 Hz frequency was determined at the temperature of maximum rate of foaming agent decomposition, and differs significantly from a sample to another. The foam density was determined at ambient temperature and the volume fraction of bubbles was used as criterion to judge the efficiency of the foaming process. The results reveal the existence of an optimal shear modulus of the order of 2 kPa that corresponds roughly to plasticizer molar masses of the order of 450 ± 50 g mol−1. Heavier plasticizers, especially polymeric ones are too difficult to deform. Lighter plasticizers such as diethyl phthalate (DEP) deform too easily and presumably facilitate bubble collapse.

Pyrolysis and combustion study of flexible polyurethane foam

The thermal degradation of flexible polyurethane foam has been studied under different conditions by thermogravimetric analysis (TG), thermogravimetric analysis-infrared spectrometry (TG-IR) and thermogravimetric analysis-mass spectrometry (TG-MS). For the kinetic study, dynamic and dynamic+isothermal runs were performed at different heating rates (5, 10 and 20 °C min−1) in three different atmospheres (N2, N2:O2 4:1 and N2:O2 9:1). Two reaction models were obtained, one for the pyrolysis and another for the combustion degradation (N2:O2 4:1 and N2:O2 9:1), simultaneously correlating the experimental data from the dynamic and dynamic+isothermal runs at different heating rates. The pyrolytic model considered consisted of two consecutive reactions with activation energies of 142 and 217.5 kJ mol−1 and reaction orders of 0.805 and 1.246. Nevertheless, to simulate the experimental data from the combustion runs, three consecutive reactions were employed with activation energies of 237.9, 103.5 and 120.1 kJ mol−1, and reaction orders of 2.003, 0.778 and 1.025. From the characterization of the sample employing TG-IR and TG-MS, the results obtained showed that the FPUF, under an inert atmosphere, started the decomposition breaking the urethane bond to produce long chains of ethers which were degraded immediately in the next step. However, under an oxidative atmosphere, at the first step not only the urethane bonds were broken but also some ether polyols started their degradation which finished at the second step producing a char that was degraded at the last stage.