16 resultados para Syntactic foams
Filtro por publicador
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (12)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (27)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (11)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (19)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (29)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (9)
- CamPuce - an association for the promotion of science and humanities in African Countries (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (75)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (4)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (6)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (33)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (4)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (3)
- Digital Peer Publishing (4)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (12)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (4)
- Duke University (1)
- Escola Superior de Educação de Paula Frassinetti (1)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (3)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (1)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (3)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (6)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (4)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (24)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (4)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (12)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (3)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (4)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (4)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (23)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (5)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (2)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Laguna (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (121)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (5)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (6)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (7)
- Universidad de Alicante (16)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (37)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (3)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade do Minho (3)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (7)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (30)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (6)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (18)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (24)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Michigan (11)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (39)
- University of Washington (3)
Resumo:
The Web 2.0 has resulted in a shift as to how users consume and interact with the information, and has introduced a wide range of new textual genres, such as reviews or microblogs, through which users communicate, exchange, and share opinions. The exploitation of all this user-generated content is of great value both for users and companies, in order to assist them in their decision-making processes. Given this context, the analysis and development of automatic methods that can help manage online information in a quicker manner are needed. Therefore, this article proposes and evaluates a novel concept-level approach for ultra-concise opinion abstractive summarization. Our approach is characterized by the integration of syntactic sentence simplification, sentence regeneration and internal concept representation into the summarization process, thus being able to generate abstractive summaries, which is one the most challenging issues for this task. In order to be able to analyze different settings for our approach, the use of the sentence regeneration module was made optional, leading to two different versions of the system (one with sentence regeneration and one without). For testing them, a corpus of 400 English texts, gathered from reviews and tweets belonging to two different domains, was used. Although both versions were shown to be reliable methods for generating this type of summaries, the results obtained indicate that the version without sentence regeneration yielded to better results, improving the results of a number of state-of-the-art systems by 9%, whereas the version with sentence regeneration proved to be more robust to noisy data.