1 resultado para level of participation
em University of Washington
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (4)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (9)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (2)
- Archive of European Integration (32)
- Aston University Research Archive (21)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (11)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (162)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (1)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (50)
- Brock University, Canada (10)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (32)
- Centro Hospitalar do Porto (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (4)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (7)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (14)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (4)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (29)
- Digital Peer Publishing (4)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (20)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (15)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (4)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (2)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (3)
- Harvard University (1)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (2)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (3)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (6)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (2)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (26)
- Open University Netherlands (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (11)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (4)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositorio Academico Digital UANL (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (27)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (50)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (9)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (28)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (7)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (15)
- Universidade do Minho (6)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (1)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (4)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (46)
- Université de Montréal (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (14)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (12)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (118)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
Resumo:
Background and Objectives: Peripheral nerve blockade requires regional anesthesia skills that trainees learn in several formats. Technical proficiency has shifted from a quota to comprehensive procedural evaluation. Successful nerve blockade is the clinical endpoint validating proficiency but patient, technical and procedural factors influence this result. The purpose of this study was to determine if procedural expertise for sciatic nerve blockade influenced postoperative pain scores and opioid requirements and if patient factors, technique and repetition influenced this outcome. Method: Sciatic nerve blockade by nerve stimulation and ultrasound guidance and training level of the resident performing the procedure were recorded. Patient obesity, trauma, chronic pain, opioid use and preoperative pain scores were compared to post-procedure pain scores and opioid analgesic requirements. Results: 102 patients received sciatic nerve blockade from 47 trainees over a 36 month interval. A significant relation between training level and improved pain scores was not demonstrated but transition from nerve stimulation to ultrasound guidance lowered scores in all groups. Nerve blockade failure was frequent with chronic opioid use and trauma. Conclusion: Analgesic outcomes should be an integral part of assessment of proficiency in regional anesthesia techniques. Evaluating outcomes of procedures throughout training will longitudinally assess technical expertise.