1 resultado para STEPS
em University of Washington
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (6)
- Repository Napier (2)
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- Aquatic Commons (3)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (20)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (9)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (4)
- Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (22)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (7)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (24)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (9)
- Chapman University Digital Commons - CA - USA (2)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (3)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (4)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (3)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (35)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (5)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (15)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Harvard University (4)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (37)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (45)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (15)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (6)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (21)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (38)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (423)
- Repositório Científico da Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (8)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (7)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (5)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (112)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (29)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (4)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Social tagging, as a particular type of indexing, has thrown into question the nature of indexing. Is it a democratic process? Can we all benefit from user-created tags? What about the value added by professionals? Employing an evolving framework analysis, this paper addresses the question: what is next for indexing? Comparing social tagging and subject cataloguing; this paper identifies the points of similarity and difference that obtain between these two kinds of information organization frameworks. The subsequent comparative analysis of the parts of these frameworks points to the nature of indexing as an authored, personal, situational, and referential act, where differences in discursive placement divide these two species. Furthermore, this act is contingent on implicit and explicit understanding of purpose and tools available. This analysis allows us to outline desiderata for the next steps in indexing.